How large is a cubic kilometer? Think of something the size of a mountain. Now multiply that by ten and you end up with a veritable mountain range. Think of it. An entire mountain range of ice. That’s a good rough comparison to the volume of ice lost from just a single Greenland glacier over the course of a mere 26 days from May 7 to June 1 of 2014.
(Massive ice loss from Jakobsbavn glacier captured by Espen Olsen. Image source: The Arctic Ice Blog.)
For according to reports from expert sea ice observer Espen over at the scientist and ice researcher camp that is Neven’s Arctic Ice Blog, about 7.5 square kilometers over an ice face about 1,300 meters tall (when including the above and below sea level ice front) shoved off from the great Jakobshavn Ibrae glacier during the past month. It was a period of time well before peak Greenland warming and one that featured a collapse of ice into the heating ocean even larger than the epic event caught on film during the seminal documentary Chasing Ice.
The Fastest Glacier in Greenland
Flowing at a speed of 46 meters per day, Jakobshavn is currently Greenland’s fastest glacier. Containing enough ice to raise global sea levels by 1.5 feet all by itself, the glacier is one of many of the Earth’s ice giants currently in the throes of irreversible decline.
Human-warmed subtropical Atlantic waters are funneled by ocean currents to the great glacier’s base. There, the high heat capacity does serious harm to the its weak underbelly, resulting in what is now an unprecedented seaward surge.
Since the 1990s, Jakobshavn’s forward rate of motion has tripled. But according to recent scientific reports, the glacier may just be at the start of an exponential spike in velocity. For as the glacier retreats it falls into a deepening chasm that exposes its front to greater and greater volumes of the warming ocean’s waters. The warm waters deliver more heat over the glacial face as it deepens even as a multiplication of melt lakes on the surface of the inland ice provide added lubrication and buoyancy to the ice base flowing into the chasm.
(Greenland map showing location of the Jakobshavn Glacier with close view of a deep channel in the bedrock. This channel was likely carved by previous discharge and at its deepest point is now more than 1,000 meters below sea level. Image source: NASA’s Earth Observatory.)
Estimates of energy transfer from the warming ocean show that Jakobshavn could reach a speed ten times 1990s values over the coming years. Ominously, the past two month’s immense calving event has shoved a large section of glacier closer to what could best be described as a high velocity melt chamber.
Greenland — An Archipelago Covered in Ice
Unfortunately, Jakobshavn is just one of Greenland’s many giant glaciers fronting deep and long chasms stretching far into the ice interior. Recent research from NASA’s Ice Bridge project revealed numerous deep rifts plunging for scores of miles into the ice sheet. The overall picture portrayed by the new study was that of an archipelago island system locked in the grip of two mile high ice mountains and riddled with deep bedrock canyons that join in a low-lying interior basin. A geography in which there is almost nowhere for ice to hide from the severe melting stress of Earth’s human-warmed oceans.
Due to this uniquely vulnerable topography lead Ice Bridge researcher Mathieu Morlighem, a UC Irvine associate project scientist concluded that:
“The glaciers of Greenland are likely to retreat faster and farther inland than anticipated – and for much longer – according to this very different topography we’ve discovered beneath the ice. This has major implications, because the glacier melt will contribute much more to rising seas around the globe.”
Human Warming Holds Numerous Large Glacial Collapses in Store
Under the current regime of human-caused climate change, the past month’s massive glacial release is likely only to be one of many. A single event of immense scale that defies imagining. Just one in an ongoing series of violent outbursts we’ve already set lose on our world.
An event of smaller, though still enormous, size was captured on film here:
(Largest glacial calving event captured on film as excerpted from the ground-breaking documentary ‘Chasing Ice.’)
It is a film that gives us some small measure of understanding of what we’ve done and what we continue to to do. For Greenland’s entire ice edge, a region unlocking ice twenty times the volume of Jakobshavn, is now in the process of deformation and collapse all while the massive glaciers of West Antarctica are also falling into irreversible release.
Links:
(Hat-tip to Colorado Bob)
Greenland Will Be Far Greater Contributor to Sea Level Rise Than Expected
Greenland’s Jakobshavn Glacier Revs-up With Climate Change
Nature: Human Warming Now Pushing Entire Greenland Ice Sheet into the Ocean
Grim News From NASA: West Antartica’s Entire Flank Collapsing into Southern Ocean
uknowispeaksense
/ June 6, 2014Reblogged this on uknowispeaksense.
LikeLike
Robert A. Vella
/ June 6, 2014Reblogged this on The Secular Jurist and commented:
“Flowing at a speed of 46 meters per day, Jakobshavn is currently Greenland’s fastest glacier. Containing enough ice to raise global sea levels by 1.5 feet all by itself, the glacier is one of many of the Earth’s ice giants currently in the throes of irreversible decline.” – Wow!
LikeLike
Bernard
/ June 6, 2014Was that ice floating or resting on land?
I’m trying to imagine wat a ~10^13 kg release in pressure would do to the bedrock, would it rebound?
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 6, 2014The front of the glacier was on bedrock directly adjacent to hundreds of feet of ice covered water.
LikeLike
Tom
/ June 6, 2014That calving event documentary clip you showed scared the begeeziz outta me when I first saw the movie. I wish I could witness the entire 75 minutes – it must have been overwhelming to see live. Once all this ice is lost there’s no gettin’ it back in human lifetimes.
This changes everything (in case you didn’t know). It’s just a matter of time now, and all the other factors that this type of event influences will influence still more. Antarctica just lost a big chunk too recently, so it’s all adding up a bit faster than the IPCC models or predictions.
Bernard, i’m no geologist but I’ve read that the mantle will indeed rebound – causing earthquakes. It also puts pressure on other parts of the globe, causing plate shifting and other events [some say volcanoes are triggered when (big enough) glaciers melt away].
Good job Robert.
LikeLike
Andrew Dodds
/ June 9, 2014I am a Geologist, at least by training..
Unloading of land due to ice melting can have some effects – earthquakes from adjustments being the biggest – and it’s just possible that unloading a volcano may bring forward an eruption that would have happened anyway. But quite frankly neither of these are huge effects, compared to the impact from melting an ice sheet in the first place.
LikeLike
Kevin Jones
/ June 6, 2014I read years ago of Henry Hudson building a rock cairn at high tide line on the shore of the bay that bears his name. It is now several feet higher due to isostatic rebound from the loss of the great last glaciation. Some 20,000-7500years before present. Ice can ‘drop’ much faster than land can rise, is my understanding. But I am STILL trying to wrap my head around the last couple weeks of discoveries from Antarctica and Greenland. The irreversibility underway, I mean. This is a game changer for my whole outlook for this world for the rest of THIS century…..
LikeLike
Jay M
/ June 6, 2014pretty good write up on isostatic rebound:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-glacial_rebound
LikeLike
Kevin Jones
/ June 6, 2014I mean I knew we would loose the Arctic sea ice in my lifetime, and that would help seal Greenland’s ice cap fate, eventually. And not likely be good for anything else. The speed and synergy of all this right here right now is simply not something I expected to see….
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 6, 2014The current human heat forcing is enormously powerful. The Earth System is racing to catch up.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 6, 2014Insurer’s Message: Prepare for Climate Change or Get Sued
To insurance companies, there’s no doubt that climate change is here: They are beginning to file lawsuits against small towns and cities who they say haven’t prepared for the floods and storms that will cost the companies billions in payments.
Earlier this week, the U.S. arm of a major global insurance company backed away from an unprecedented lawsuit against Chicago and its suburbs for failing to prepare for heavy rains and associated flooding it claimed were fueled by global warming. While legal experts said the case was a longshot, its withdrawal didn’t alter the message it contained for governments: prepare now for climate change or pay the price.
http://www.nbcnews.com/science/environment/insurers-message-prepare-climate-change-or-get-sued-n122856
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 6, 2014I’d say governments need to start building a case against the fossil fuel industry for damages. Insurers should probably go that route as well. It’s tougher to say a city should have been prepared when the political situation was held in limbo by oil interests, easier to gain precedent by taking on the guilty parties directly.
LikeLike
dtlange
/ June 7, 2014Correct, and governments are held hostage by fossil fuel industries. Countless industry jobs maintain act like ransom and voting consumers power the whole insidious enterprise.
That’s my somewhat jaded view.
BTW, your timely posts are invaluable.
Thanks, DT
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014Total renewable industry jobs (wind, solar, hydro, biofuel, geothermal) in the US as of late 2013: 1,056,900. Total coal, oil, and gas industry jobs as of late 2013: 998,000.
Renewables generate more than twice the number of jobs per dollar invested.
FF jobs don’t hold US politicians hostage. It’s just the fact that the Republican Party and conservatives in general are owned lock, stock, and barrel by fossil fuel companies.
LikeLike
Bryan Stairs
/ June 7, 2014Actually you are starting to see it. There have been a couple of cases in Canada already that insurers have taken cities to court and I believe won because infrastructure was not put into place to handle a weather catastrophe that if they had listened to main stream science would have told them that it WAS going to happen.
It is my belief that governments will only make dramatic changes because the courts and financial institutions will demand it of them. Of course it will be like closing the barn door after it has already been empty.
LikeLike
Ed-M
/ June 9, 2014Talk about being owned by the FF companies….! This Friday our governor here in Louisiana, his royal highness (/sarcasm) Bobby Jindal, has signed a bill into law that was intended to kill a lawsuit by the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East to recover damages caused by oil companies’ failure to meet their obligations to restore the land or at least close the oil drilling access canals after the canals were no longer needed. It was ALSO worded vaguely enough to possibly kill all other similar lawsuits that have already been filed but no verdict has yet been reach, forestall any such future ones, and even the ongoing state and local lawsuits against BP for damages by the Macondo / Deep Horizon drilling rig “accident”.
LikeLike
Jacob
/ June 10, 2014Yes, Ed. This is a very disconcerting development. I am SMH at this madness and fear the only way it will ever be stopped is in an un-peaceful manner. Hope I’m wrong about that, but to this point all observations indicate it is an accurate conclusion to come to.
LikeLike
Ed-M
/ June 12, 2014@Jacob: “I am SMH at this madness and fear the only way it will ever be stopped is in an unpeaceful manner.”
Are you thinking of World War III? Because I don’t see the American public (ditto Canadian, Australian, New Zealander, etc) will rise up against this madness anytime soon, especially if it might affect their way of life, despite the fact that most are just getting by — people are utterly dependent on the way things are.
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 19, 2014@Jacob: “I am SMH at this madness and fear the only way it will ever be stopped is in an un-peaceful manner.” – Your right, but perhaps the antagonists aren’t who you would expect.
@Ed-M: “Are you thinking of World War III? … people are utterly dependent on the way things are.” – You right, too. I agree it won’t be the lower class rising up. But WWIII might be on its way anyway.
The matter, in my opinion, will be driven by the Sunni – Shia conflict, whilst fought over lands containing 1/2 of the worlds supply of oil. Business as usual, and Western people in a state of utter dependency will ensure that the various factions are empowered. Arab Sunnis vs Iranian Shia, pick a side. Then watch the winner take on Israel.
Reminds me of a koan. This stick is being used as a cane. Answer me now, which is it a stick or a cane?
They are one and the same, you can’t pick sides. We have to throw the bloody thing away and learn to walk on our own 2 feet.
(No-one intended as the recipient of that little rant, and no sticks were injured).
LikeLike
Ed-M
/ June 19, 2014@Paul, while I don’t think the Sunni-Shia conflict will set off World War III, I think the Ukraine business probably will! The goal being to surround Russia with NATO of US-friendly allies and go for the kill so that US oligarchs can exploit the methane clathrates to their heart’s content. Only thing is, Putin is in no mood to agree for encirclement of his motherland and he wants to exploit the clathrates, too, only keep the profits wholly within Mother Russia. One of these days, Russia is going to have to respond militarily to what’s going on in Ukraine and given the type of people currently running foreign affairs and defense in Washington, NATO will respond militarily, too.
LikeLike
Andy (in San Diego)
/ June 7, 2014Checking Greenland melt extent for the 3rd. It looks like the heat from Newfoundland/Quebec is starting to bite into the ice. Once it reaches over to Greenland, it should be a fairly strong melt. Also, the melt around the edges is underway. The North East outflow has been pretty responsive now since the beginning of May, and is now picking up it’s pace.
http://nsidc.org/greenland-today/
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014We have Fohn winds on the west facing shores. These tend to further enhance melt. So far, it’s been a rather strong melt year for Greenland.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 7, 201466-Million-Year-Old Wildfire Reveals the Climate During the Last Days of the Dinosaurs
“We were looking at the direct result of a 66-million-year-old forest fire, preserved in stone,” said Emily Bamforth, one of the researchers, in a news release. “Moreover, we now have evidence that the mean annual temperature in southern Saskatchewan was 10-12 degrees Celsius warmer than today, with almost six times as much precipitation.”
http://www.scienceworldreport.com/articles/15235/20140606/66-million-year-old-wildfire-reveals-climate-during-last-days.htm
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014Hothouse + asteroid is bad news.
LikeLike
John
/ June 7, 2014Reblogged this on jpratt27 and commented:
Earth warms, ice melts, seas rise it’s just simple science.
LikeLike
Griffin
/ June 7, 2014Great post again Robert! I have to say that my thoughts echo those of Kevin Jones, this is becoming rather exciting quickly. The acceleration of events is simply incredible.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014It’s a big mess!
LikeLike
colinc
/ June 7, 2014That seems a little too abstract so let’s put some real dimensions to the image. First, 1 cubic km can be visualized as a cube that is 1 km on each side or, alternatively, 1,000 meters on a side. Therefore, 10 cubic kilometers is equivalent to 10 Billion cubic meters or, for the metric-challenged, roughly 353,146,667,215 cubic feet. I recently read that the “average home” (in the USA) is now about 2,500 sq.ft. which translates to a livable volume of 20,000 cubic feet (not including attic/roof/basement). Therefore, that 10 cubic km block of ice would fill roughly 17,657,333 houses!
Nonetheless, for those who prefer the “mountain” metaphor, let’s visualize that mountain as a regualar tetrahedron. This will result in a pyramid/mountain that has edges of 14,417 feet (2.73 mi) and a height of 11,771 feet. So, if we placed this pyramid adjacent to Pike’s Peak (Colorado Springs, CO) it would tower over that venerated landmark by more than 3,000 feet (assuming no geologic compression beneath the pyramid)! Hopefully these figures lend a little more perspective to the abstraction.
LikeLike
Griffin
/ June 7, 2014“Hopefully these figures lend a little more perspective to the abstraction” Yes! Thank you Colinc, that is a very good visual for the magnitude of the event. Wow!
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014I put the mountain metaphor in due to the simple fact that people understand mountains. Thanks for the extra mathematical detail, though. 😉
LikeLike
colinc
/ June 7, 2014Of course, you’re welcome. Seems I am prone to missing “typos” in “a href-tags” and I forgot to include another figure. That tetrahedron would cover an area (the “base” being 1 “face”) of 116,191,620 sq.ft. = 4.17 sq.mi. = 46,476.6 “average homes”.
LikeLike
colinc
/ June 7, 2014Ooops, my bad and apologies to all. The correct “coverage” is 90,001,181.25 sq.ft. = 3.23 sq.mi. = 36,000.5 homes. I guess I shouldn’t do arithmetic late at night and after my second “3-fingers” of bourbon!
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014No worries. It’s a good illustration, regardless.
LikeLike
mikkel
/ June 7, 2014I think Hansen is correct that we’re looking at 5m sea level rise by 2100. I am not entirely clear about what percentage of the world will be displaced by that, but it is obvious that if we were smart we would start relocating everyone now by building no-carbon and food integrated communities far inland. .
LikeLike
colinc
/ June 7, 2014“A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it.” – Agent K to Officer Edwards, Men in Black
LikeLike
Andy in Bangalore
/ June 7, 2014Regarding isostatic rebound. . . In Juneau, AK structures that were at the oceans edge in 1900 are now a quarter mile inland. NOAA has a useful site, although it is not clear how often the data is updated, showing net sea level trends around the world:
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends.shtml
The soil in my garden in SE AK, though well back from the beach, is underlain by a nice layer of what was formerly beach gravel of volcanic origin, which provides good drainage and a source of minerals for the plants. We are currently gaining beach frontage since our area is rising about 2mm per year. I have no illusions about long term sea level rise, but it is good for now.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 7, 2014Back to Greenland –
The Peterman is the big dog. It has the deepest canyon , which runs deep into the heart of Greenland . Deeper than the Grand Canyon.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014And that one keeps splitting off Manhattan-sized chunks as well.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 7, 2014And it’s calving just like the Jakobshavn, but it;s at the top of Greenland.
All our past plots are rather behind our current curve.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014This year has been a bit of an eye opener, hasn’t it? Pace of events keep ramping up. Glaciers aren’t so glacial anymore.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014Dear goodness, we have 70 F temps on the shores of the Laptev now (12:48 EST).
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 7, 2014The rebound , I was thinking it would be slow. But I was wrong..
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 7, 2014Our changes are 10 times faster than the PETM . We are in deep shit , anything is possible.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014Ah. That rebound.
You’re right. We’re pushing the Earth system harder than she’s ever been pushed that has to have bad consequences.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014Getting intense temps of 45-47 C from the SEA coast of a India all the way to the interior. Another very brutal day.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014Isostatic?
LikeLike
Kevin Jones
/ June 7, 2014In geology: isostacy . The planet is fighting for its’ equilibrium . And not ours.
LikeLike
Kevin Jones
/ June 7, 2014isostasy
LikeLike
Kevin Jones
/ June 7, 2014In 1979 the mid point of sea ice area for melt season was about 10.25 million sq. km. It is now below 9.7 million sq. km. And only 6/4/14. Albedo!
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014Very close to the record low line. Very large drop this week.
LikeLike
Espen Olsen
/ June 7, 2014Hello Robert,
Thanks for bringing this important information out.
Espen
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014How could I not? Great catch on your part!
LikeLike
Kevin Jones
/ June 7, 2014Robert. May I use this great space to invite any and all to join us on the 5th of July? http://www.nhrebellion.org/ If you go to ‘news & events’ then ‘blog’ you’ll see a new video which may be of interest. Thanks, All.
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 7, 2014Sounds good Kevin! When the Republican candidates come around before the 2016 primary, I plan to ‘bird-dog’ some of them to ask about their stance on global warming and environmental protection in general.
LikeLike
1 C MAX
/ June 7, 2014First time poster; outstanding blog!
LikeLike
1 C MAX
/ June 7, 2014Robert,
You have covered many climate change topics in the few months that I’ve been following your blog. Almost all show troubling degradation, with many starting to accelerate the decline. Could you summarize the main trouble spots we are seeing today, never minding projections 25 years out, or in 2100? It appears to me superficially that we are seeing collapse at 0.8 C, not 2 C or 4 C. Am I over-interpreting?
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014We certainly now see an acceleration of harmful change, although I think this trend began in the early to mid 2000s and is just becoming more clear now.
As for the request for a broad summary, that’s probably worthy of a rather significant blog post. Since it’s probably needed, I’ll start working on it this weekend.
Thanks for the helpful insights and suggestions.
LikeLike
Gerald Spezio
/ June 7, 2014Los Angeles uses about 190 billion gallons of water per year, most of it pumped at tremendous energy cost – the largest energy consumption in CA.
There are 264 billion gallons in a cu. km.
Total water use in LA = about three fourths of one cu km per year.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014Another excellent comparison. Very much liking the added context.
LikeLike
climatehawk1
/ June 8, 2014I like it too. Would also be helpful to have 1) gallons, 2) acre-feet, and maybe a comparison to one of the Great Lakes. I will poke around a bit and see what I can come up with.
LikeLike
climatehawk1
/ June 9, 2014So, answer appears to be 1) roughly 2.5 trillion gallons, 2) 7.7 million acre-feet, and roughly 2% of Lake Erie.
LikeLike
Kevin Jones
/ June 7, 2014Gerald Speaking of Energy, may I recommend Richard Heinberg’s : IEA Says the Party is Over. http://www.postcarbon.org/
LikeLike
Spike
/ June 7, 2014Reducing deforestation in the tropics could cut carbon dioxide emissions by up to one-fifth, a university study shows.
In the first study of its kind, scientists have calculated the amount of carbon absorbed by the world’s tropical forests and the amounts of greenhouse gas emissions created by loss of trees, as a result of human activity.
http://www.ed.ac.uk/news/2014/060614-tropics
I sort of visualise a new iceberg calving for each tree that comes crashing down.
LikeLike
Bryan Stairs
/ June 7, 2014I have too many friends who either believe things are going really bad really fast and are quiet about it as the loudest voices are denialists or are the denialists themselves. Ands even if you get them to admit there could be a problem, government will rescue them.
I give them one example. Can the USA build a dike big enough to save every city that is going to flooded on the eastern seaboard? Do they truely understand the costs and time it would take to do that?
I look at the forecasts for Greenland and Antarctica and then I compare that to what was said about the Arctic 10 years ago. The same reasoning was used about those who came up with the worst case scenarios and look what happened. Our knowledge about ice is truely so bad that the reality …….
LikeLike
Gerald Spezio
/ June 7, 2014Today;
“Ten Cubic Kilometers of Ice Lost From Jakobshavn Glacier in Less than One Month.”
“Dear goodness, we have 70 F temps on the shores of the Laptev now (12:48 EST).”
…and it’s only June
On June 3rd;
“That’s an area of ice the size of Nevada lost in a single 24 hour period.”
…and it’s only June
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 7, 2014For the June 3 reference, it’s worth noting that sea ice melt is most rapid typically in mid June. At that point, we tend to hit a cliff as Baffin Bay and Hudson Bay rapidly melt out. This year, the rapid melt is coming early due to weather conditions in the Laptev causing a highly anomalous loss of ice there.
The rate of loss for June 2 was probably among the fastest in the area record.
LikeLike
Kevin Jones
/ June 7, 2014USCGC Healy in very weak ice. http:icefloe.net/Aloftconn Photos/
LikeLike
Kevin Jones
/ June 7, 2014icefloe.net/Aloftcon_Photos/ …hope this works
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 8, 2014Afghanistan flash floods kill more than 70 in north
KUNDUZ: Flash floods have killed more than 70 people in northern Afghanistan, washing away hundreds of homes and forcing thousands to flee, officials said Saturday warning that the death toll was expected to rise.
The floods in a remote mountainous district of Baghlan province come a month after a landslide triggered by heavy rains buried a village and killed 300 people in a nearby region.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/region/08-Jun-2014/afghanistan-flash-floods-kill-more-than-70-in-north
LikeLike
Griffin
/ June 8, 2014Those rains must have been ferocious. Certainly the effects cannot be dismissed as “well they built on a floodplain”. I would venture a guess that a people who’s ties to the agricultural world run deeper than the average westerner would tend to be aware of flood prone area’s and avoid them. No FEMA there after all, but still they have fallen victim to the incredible amount of rain our atmosphere is now capable of dumping on a given location.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 8, 2014Paraguay floods continue
Thousands continue to struggle with aftermath of heavy rains and overflowing rivers.
Torrential rains have forced the evacuation of more than 75,000 people across Paraguay. There has been widespread flooding which has disrupted the lives of those located in low-lying areas near the Paraguay River.
The Paraguay weather service said the heavy rains started in February with 221mm falling on the capital of Asuncion in just one day. The rainy season runs until the end of May, but the bad weather has continued into June.
http://www.aljazeera.com/weather/2014/06/paraguay-floods-continue-20146695648383723.html
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 8, 2014Seems that each day we get new reports totaling 100,000 to 300,000 displaced by floods. Major ongoing disruption.
LikeLike
Griffin
/ June 8, 2014And to think that the expected rise in atmospheric temps that would accompany an El Nino event would mean an even higher water content possibly held aloft. We are simply not prepared for what can happen to us even today. Never mind the end of the century!
LikeLike
Phil
/ June 8, 2014Seems to be alot of fog in the arctic – be interesting to see if it is the ice eating type. Extent does not seem to be dropping too rapidly and the latest of 628 square KM’s seems somewhat baffling and generally starting to produce debate on Arctic Sea Ice Forum. Seems Hudson Bay and Baffin Bay, in particular, might be lagging a bit. Not sure if satellite pictures are bringing any further clarity to what is actually happening.
Will be interesting to see what eventuates this week.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 8, 2014The difference between area and extent is a bit baffling in the measures. That large hole in the Laptev just keeps growing. Baffin is on its final drop for the season.
LikeLike
1 C MAX
/ June 8, 2014“As for the request for a broad summary, that’s probably worthy of a rather significant blog post. Since it’s probably needed, I’ll start working on it this weekend.”
That would be very helpful. I read four or five climate blogs daily, and I am finding inconsistencies and disconnects among 1) where we need to go, 2) where we are now, and 3) what we need to do that will take us from where we are to where we need to go. The blog that appears to focus most on where we need to go is David Spratt’s ClimateCodeRed. His most recent posting (http://www.climatecodered.org/) suggests there is no more room for additional CO2 emissions, and his previous monograph (http://www.climatecodered.org/p/is-climate-change-already-dangerous.html) suggests that climate change is dangerous now. The blog that appears to contain the most comprehensive summary of where we are now is Guy McPherson’s Climate-Change Summary and Update (http://guymcpherson.com/2013/01/climate-change-summary-and-update/). There is much detail presented especially on the positive feedbacks we are experiencing now. However, the overall tone is one of hopelessness, and I question whether that influences the selection of data.
Given the inconsistencies especially of where we need to go, there is a plethora of different approaches recommended on the different blogs. If Spratt’s sources on where we need to go are correct, it’s difficult for me to see how the pure low carbon technology substitutions recommended on most of the blogs can provide the emission and concentration reductions required. I’m hoping you can offer some clarity to this situation.
LikeLike
colinc
/ June 8, 2014You are quite correct that there are “inconsistencies and disconnects.” Indeed, there is a veritable cornucopia of them. There are, of course, a multitude of “reasons” for this situation. Obviously and oft reported are the “monied interests” wishing to maintain the status quo who gladly pay people to deny and obfuscate any and all “real” science. Regardless, a less noted reason is that the “best and brightest” are not necessarily the ones who rise to positions of authority and/or power. I’m sure most “educated and reasonable” people understand that not every website (blog or otherwise) or book/paper is hosted/authored by “experts.” For example, Dr. Stephen Chu once suggested that roofs be painted white to “restore albedo.” This exemplifies a failed understanding that the climate we know and love depends on WHERE the “primary” reflectivity is, i.e. the Arctic, not just the “quantity.”. Painting roofs white around the world in densely populated regions would have a significant impact on weather patterns (climate), as much as GHGs, and it would NOT necessarily be “good.”
You comment that on NBL “the overall tone is one of hopelessness, and I question whether that influences the selection of data.” I would suggest that you have that wrong way around. If you were to attentively read the entirety of your last cited link and peruse a handful (or more) of the links Dr. McPherson provides you may come to realize that the preponderance of his aggregated data precipitates the “hopelessness.” Personally, I only find disagreement with Guy, as well as Dr. Kevin Anderson, David Wasdell, Sam Carana, and virtually everyone else, in one significant aspect… they are ALL way too optimistic. After all, they primarily focus on climate/weather “conditions” with nary a mention of the knock-on effects to which I’ve alluded in my reply to Griffin below.
LikeLike
todaysguestis
/ June 10, 2014In my opinion Guy McPherson is not a reliable guide in this matter, far too often I’ve found that his sources don’t say what he says they do. He’s like a climate denier in reverse cherry picking data to suit his position of doom.
David Spratt I think is far better. Oh and Robert here as well 🙂
LikeLike
climatehawk1
/ June 10, 2014Agreed. I personally think the facts are scary enough, for anyone who is listening and actually trying to understand them.
LikeLike
Apneaman
/ June 11, 2014Never heard of David Spratt, before, so I checked him out. He don’t sound too hopeful either. Neither did the late Frank Fenner.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/frank-fenner-sees-no-hope-for-humans/story-e6frgcjx-1225880091722
LikeLike
colinc
/ June 11, 2014todaysguest, you say “… far too often I’ve found that his sources don’t say what he says they do.” I’m curious, which particular sources have you found to be incongruent with Guy’s assertions. I’ll admit I haven’t checked all of his sources but, of the ones that I have (more than 90% over the past 5 years), I have found no disagreement. Of course, few, if any, of Guy’s sources concur with his conclusion. In fact, I also disagree with his conclusion in that I think he is overly optimistic. To borrow from Colorado Bob’s frequent refrain (from The Outlaw Josey Wales) “Hell is coming to breakfast little lady”… and it will be staying for lunch, dinner, late night snacks and beyond the foreseeable future.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 8, 2014Sea star wasting syndrome epidemic along the coast
Trinidad sees 80 percent population decline from mysterious disease
Oregon was one of the only areas on the West Coast that had remained relatively free of the disease up to this point, but a recent outbreak there has “created an epidemic of historic magnitude” that “threatens to decimate Oregon’s entire population of purple ochre sea stars,” according to a report by Oregon State University science writer David Stauth.
“This is an unprecedented event,” said Bruce Menge, professor of marine biology at OSU. “We’ve never seen anything of this magnitude before. We have no clue what’s causing this epidemic, how severe the damage might be or how long that damage might last. It’s very serious. Some of the sea stars most heavily affected are keystone predators that influence the whole diversity of life in the intertidal zone.”
http://www.times-standard.com/localnews/ci_25922918/sea-star-wasting-syndrome-epidemic-along-coast
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 8, 2014All it took was a hint of summer.
You’ll get your starfish song, I promise.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 8, 2014North India sizzles under blistering heat, Nowgong records 47.8 degree Celsius
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/north-india-sizzles-under-blistering-heat-nowgong-records-478-degree-celsius/477640-3.html
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 8, 2014118.04 F degrees
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 8, 2014El Niño Odds Raised to 70% by NOAA, But El Niño is Actually Imminent
By: Michael Ventrice , 2:36 PM GMT on June 07, 2014
Today’s guest blog post is by Dr. Michael Ventrice, an operational scientist for the Energy team at Weather Services International (WSI). This is a follow-up post to the ones he did on February 21 and April 4 on the progress of El Niño. Today’s post is quite technical! – Jeff Masters
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=2694
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 8, 2014Sea surface states, as noted here, do seem to support that assessment.
OT – I feel happy every time Anthony Watts attacks me (quite a lot today).
LikeLike
Apneaman
/ June 8, 2014I hope Anthony is enjoying the glow of the denier spot light. I wonder if he thinks the Rex Tillerson’s and James Inhofe’s will protect him when millions of angry, suffering Americans start demanding vengeance? No, what will happen to Anthony and the other tools of the elite is they will scapegoat him. They will turn their PR machine on him. It’s always been done that way.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 8, 2014OT – I feel happy every time Anthony Watts attacks me (quite a lot today).
Silly wabbit.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 8, 2014The supply of safe water in Syria is now one-third of the level it was before March 2011 when the civil war began, Unicef said Friday in a report that warns of new levels of suffering because of a worsening regional drought. The report said the 9.6 million Syrians affected by the conflict, half of them children, are at increased risk of disease because the water scarcity has compounded problems caused by damage to water and sewage systems. Parts of Syria have received the lowest levels of rainfall in more than half a century, the report said, and most parts of the country have only received half the average rainfall of a normal year. The drought also threatens to put new pressures on Jordan, Lebanon and Iraq, where Syrian refugees are already straining the water supply.
Link
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 8, 2014I think it’s fair to say that the drought in Syria is now essentially generational. Whole groups won’t even remember a time without these worsening conditions. Our delaying transition away from fossil fuels caused this.
LikeLike
Griffin
/ June 8, 2014I thought of your mentioned upcoming report on current impacts when I read this Robert.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/india-riots-sparked-by-heat-wave-power-outages-1.2668358
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 8, 2014Damn. It’s very tough for India’s coal-fired grid to keep up with the record heat. Bet they wished they’d invested more in solar. Then they would have an energy surplus exactly when they need it.
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 8, 2014Someone in another thread pointed to a study on the correlation between extreme heat and frustration and violence. Confirmed once again. And the future will have more and more of this … I wonder how many years from now the term ‘Happy New Year’ will get the same negative reaction as ‘Happy Holidaze’ gets now?
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 8, 2014It’s like hunger. When human beings are pushed to bodily limits, the tendency for violence and social destabilization increases.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 8, 2014No respite from heat is expected in the next four to five days with no indication of rain so far and the monsoon at least two weeks away, MeT office director Anand Sharma said.
http://post.jagran.com/Sweltering-heat-grips-Uttarakhand-plains-Dehradun-records-41-degrees-Celsius-1402136120
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 8, 2014Normal high temperatures are 104 degrees F (40 C), and the past 5 days have seen high temperatures climb to 110 degrees F (43 C) or higher. The all-time record high for New Delhi for June is 116 degrees F (46.7 C), according to the India Weather Service.
http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/record-heat-for-new-delhi/28377875
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 8, 2014More news from the world of “Extreme (Fossil) Energy”:
‘Conclusive Link’ Between Fracking, Aquifer Contamination Found in Texas’ – Scientists say water samples from Texas man’s well show identical chemical signatures from nearby gas drilling operations.
I realize it’s a ‘duh’ type of study, but as someone commenting there pointed out, the people fighting fracking in their backyards need scientific studies to make their claims credible, otherwise the gas and oil companies can just obfuscate forever.
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/06/06-1
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 8, 2014It’s good to see landowners/farmers/residents getting scientific proofs to back their water contamination observations. Sad to see that base evidence alone isn’t enough.
LikeLike
Griffin
/ June 8, 2014I have always tried to tell those that I argue with that the biggest threat is not the weather itself, but the negative human reaction to the weather making life difficult. Our track record as a species is not a good one.
LikeLike
colinc
/ June 8, 2014Indeed, “human reactions” are a significant cause for concern. However, those will be secondary effects. (Unless, of course, one of them is global, thermonuclear war.) As noted above and earlier, in a few places around the world and outside the “good ol’ USofA,” water and electric power are becoming less and less reliable. Anyone believing those maladies won’t soon happen in this country (USA) hasn’t been paying attention. So, food for thought, what happens when automated safety systems, which require and depend on uninterrupted electricity, fail? What “safety systems” do I mean? Consider those at refineries, chemical manufacturers (remember Bhopal and Pepcon?), pharmaceutical plants, anywhere that uses high-temperature/pressure systems and, wait for it, bio-hazard level 4 facilities, just to name a few. What happens when water-treatment facilities shutdown permanently? It matters not whether electricity is produced by turbines in dams or at fossil-fuel fired facilities, when the water is gone, so is the electric and no one in the afflicted regions will be going anywhere and won’t be much of a “problem” for long. Of course, the tertiary, “final straw,” effect will be when dozens, perhaps tens of dozens, of Fukushimas blossom around the country and the world.
LikeLike
Apneaman
/ June 9, 2014Climate disasters are bad for supply chains and are going to get worse.
“Links in global economic chains and world markets mean that extreme weather in one place can have repercussions elsewhere”
http://www.nature.com/news/climate-economics-make-supply-chains-climate-smart-1.14636
LikeLike
nickcayman
/ June 9, 2014Reblogged this on Nick Robson's Blog.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 9, 2014Siberia is warming faster than anywhere in the world, warns top Russian geophysicist
Siberia is associated around the world with cold but it is now the capital of global warming, says distinguished Russian meteorological authority Valentin Meleshko, former head of St Petersburg-based Voyeikov Geophysical Observatory.
One impact will be even more snow in winter leading to excessive flooding in late spring and early summer, as seen last year in the devastating submerging of vast tracts of the Far East of Russia.
‘The process of warming in Siberia goes faster than elsewhere; it is not just hypothesis, there is data and observational evidence to prove it. Siberia is warming faster than any other place in the world,’ Mr Meleshko told the The Siberian Times.
‘In theory we can delineate the influence of anthropogenic (manmade) factors and natural changes. For the last 30 years, we have seen the significant reduction of ice cover in the Arctic and we can observe significant warming there. It reduced by about 30%’.
http://siberiantimes.com/ecology/opinion/news/siberia-is-warming-faster-than-anywhere-in-the-world-warns-top-russian-geophysicist/
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 9, 2014Study: Alaska’s future looks more rainy, less snowy
Alaskans of the future might have to stock up on ice cleats and endure disappointing snow seasons. A newly published study calculates the degrees to which precipitation falling from the sky will be rain instead of snow, a transformation expected over the rest of the 21st century as the far north climate warms.
The study, published in the June issue of the journal Hydrological Processes, uses a model based on decades of weather data from around the state. It applies the derived calculations of past temperature and precipitation to a suite of well-respected climate-prediction models used by the Scenarios Network for Alaska and Arctic Planning at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
The result is a range of forecasts for future precipitation mixtures around Alaska, with snowy seasons expected to become more rainy.
Read more here: Link
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 9, 2014Climate change at the Arctic’s edge
A ticking circumpolar time bomb is set to release more greenhouse gases than everything humanity has put into the atmosphere since the industrial revolution: what happens if permafrost loses its permanence? A field report from the frontlines.
Link
LikeLike
james cole
/ June 10, 2014That is the kind of positive feedback that people talked about being something for the late 21st century at earliest. Just a few years ago the science reports were all about arctic sea ice being in danger in 50-100 years. Reality is smacking us all in the face, we were way too conservative, I call it wishful thinking. Everyone found it easy to push these effects off to a time when it was a future generation of people who would face it. Now we know, it is here and we in the present generations are going to be around to see global warming in all it’s disaster. This only makes me wonder how awfully bad it will be in 50 years. Imagine, we are not slowing down, we are picking up speed and we are decades ahead of schedule. Who would care to predict what weather and climate will be in 50 years? At the present rate, 50 years from now will see a global melt down and human disaster.
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 10, 2014Yep, it’s scary all right.
LikeLike
Apneaman
/ June 10, 2014I’m thinking 5 years, James. When peak oil and financial crash meet climate change.
LikeLike
seemorerocks
/ June 9, 2014http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/heat-spurs-record-breaking-weather-in-moscow/501496.html
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 9, 2014Letter from Serbia: we are drowning in a flood of censorship
Serbia has been battered by two storms: first there were mass floods; then a wave of terrifying Internet censorship, which has included denial-of-service attacks, arrests over Facebook discussions of the flood casualties, and ISPs mysteriously shuttering websites critical of the government. We’re proud to present an open letter from BlogOpen-BlogClosed, announcing a netcast strategy conference on Tuesday, June 10 at 1PM CET.
http://boingboing.net/2014/06/08/letter-from-serbia-we-are-dro.html
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 9, 2014Re: Jakobshavn Isbræ / Sermeq Kujalleq / Ilulissat Icefjord
« Reply #224 on: June 08, 2014, 09:56:49 PM »
Believe it or not Jakobshavn continues its massive calvings:
Please click on image to start animation!
https://forum.arctic-sea-ice.net/index.php/topic,154.msg27935.html#msg27935
LikeLike
Andy (in San Diego)
/ June 9, 2014On Sunday, the maximum temperature in Delhi hit 47.8 degree Celsius (118.04 Fahrenheit) – a record high in 62 years, according to India Meteorological Department. Forecasters expected average temperatures of 45 degree Celsius (113 Fahrenheit) for the rest of the week.
Temperatures soared to 47 degrees Celsius (117 Fahrenheit) in the city of Lucknow causing power demand to spike at 11,000 megawatts – much greater than the state’s capacity of 8,000 MW capacity – which triggered blackouts that shut down water pumps, air conditioners and fans.
Palam registered its hottest at 47.2 degrees on Friday. In Patiala, Punjab, the mercury soared to 45.6 degrees while in Amritsar and Ludhiana it went up to 45.5 degrees—four degrees above normal.
In Chandigarh, too, this is the hottest summer in years, recording 44.5 degrees, five degrees above normal.
Gone are the days when people fled the heat to the hill stations; in Shimla, the maximum temperature was 30.7 degrees Celsius, six degrees above normal. In Kullu it was 36.5 degrees and Dharamsala, the Dalai Lama’s followers would be sweating it out at 35.4 degrees. Even Manali sweltered under 27.2 degrees.
Meanwhile, the temperature in North India has been recorded over 45 degree Celsius.
Furthermore, states like Punjab, Haryana, Delhi, Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh may face drought.
With all of the heat in the north, the Himalayas may be taking a hit on their snow pack.
Hoping that Andy in Bangalore is OK in all of this.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 9, 2014Siberia is known for its winter cold: will it soon be as famous for its summer floods?
By The Siberian Times reporter08 June 2014
More flooding misery due to burst dam as experts say the cause is global warming.
http://siberiantimes.com/ecology/others/news/siberia-is-known-for-its-winter-cold-will-it-soon-be-as-famous-for-its-summer-floods/
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 9, 2014The day the ice cap died
The title of this blog post is actually the title of a piece of science fiction, a short story written by Paul Briggs. Just like a couple of weeks ago when I was asked for advice on an idea for a novel, Paul asked me for some feedback on his short story. I figured posting it here, will generate a lot more feedback than I can offer. And most of you will probably find it an interesting read.
Paul writes on his website:
Link
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 10, 2014Wow – what a compelling future scenario! I hope this is widely read. Thanks Colorado Bob for brining it to our attention.
LikeLike
Miep
/ June 10, 2014I found “The Day the Ice Cap Died” well worth reading, as well. It has a lot of nice sociopolitical detail. Reminded me quite a bit of Brunner’s apocalyptic work.
LikeLike
climatehawk1
/ June 10, 2014Huh, good point. Here’s a nice quote I remember from Brunner’s “A Torrent of Faces” (about an impending medium-sized asteroid strike on Earth): “No, we shall not all die. But we shall all be changed.”
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 11, 2014Miep or Climatehawk1 – can you remind me of Brunner’s first name? Is it Paul?
I’d like to check out some of his work. I may have read one of his novels Long ago, but am not sure. Any recommendations on where to start?
LikeLike
climatehawk1
/ June 11, 2014Mark, Brunner’s first name is John. It’s been a long time since I read anything of his, and the only two novels I can call to mind are “A Torrent of Faces” and “Stand on Zanzibar.” Both seem relevant to this discussion.
LikeLike
Miep
/ June 11, 2014“The Sheep Look Up” is the sequel to “Stand On Zanzibar.” It’s especially grim.
LikeLike
Gerald Spezio
/ June 9, 2014Sam Carana has just posted this update of the prescient predictions of both Shakhova & Semelitov at ARCTIC NEWS June 9, 2014
Methane
Temperature rises of the water close to the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean are very dangerous, as heat can penetrate sediments and cause hydrate destabilization. Huge amounts of methane are held in sediments at the seafloor, in the form of free gas and hydrates. In shallow waters, methane released from the seafloor can more easily enter the atmosphere without getting broken down by microbes in the water.
Methane levels are already very high. On June 6, 2014, mean global methane reached levels as high as 1809 ppb, with peaks as high as 2516 ppb.
Methane release from the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean will warm up the Arctic even further, triggering even more methane releases, heatwaves, wildfires and further feedbacks, in a spiral of runaway warming, threatening to cause starvation, destruction and extintion at massive scale across the globe.
LikeLike
Gerald Spezio
/ June 9, 2014A succinct blurb from Colorado Bob’s non-fiction circumpolar time bomb link above.
Abrupt permafrost methane release combined with the abrupt release of gigatons from the Arctic Sea bed should make for some interesting non-fiction science.
If this doesn’t make all else appear petty, you must be watching t.v.
Could it get any worse on the climate change front?
Of course — but few are aware of the most likely scenario under which things might truly unravel: the sudden release of gigatons of powerful greenhouse gasses due to rapid loss of sub-polar permafrost. It may not be as visible or as sexy as a fracturing ice sheet, but the process of millions of square kilometres of previously frozen muskeg becoming dangerously squishy is likewise well underway. And, as many in the field maintain, now equally irreversible.
Woe is me, you, & all the fishes in the sea., Mama.
LikeLike
Gerald Spezio
/ June 9, 2014MUSKEG?
Muskeg is an acidic soil type common in Arctic and boreal areas, although it is found in other northern climates as well. Muskeg is approximately synonymous with bogland, but muskeg is the standard term in Western Canada and Alaska, while ‘bog’ is common elsewhere. The term became common in these areas because it is of Cree origin; maskek (ᒪᐢᑫᐠ) meaning low-lying marsh.[1] Large tracts of this soil existing in Siberia may be called muskeg or bogland interchangeably.
Muskeg consists of dead plants in various states of decomposition (as peat), ranging from fairly intact sphagnum moss, to sedge peat, to highly decomposed humus. Pieces of wood can make up five to 15 percent of the peat soil. Muskeg tends to have a water table near the surface. The sphagnum moss forming it can hold 15 to 30 times its own weight in water, allowing the spongy wet muskeg to form on sloping ground. Muskeg patches are ideal habitats for beavers, pitcher plants, agaric mushrooms and a variety of other organisms.
LikeLike
Andy in Bangalore
/ June 10, 2014Starting yesterday the weather cooled significantly and daytime highs are 30-31 C. No rain in the forecast for the next 10 days.
Anyone else see the articles on the front page of Desdemona this am (India time)? The collapse of ecosystems is accelerating.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 10, 2014Anyone else see the articles on the front page of Desdemona this am (India time)? The collapse of ecosystems is accelerating.
Missed that , got a link ? Glad to hear the heat backed-off.
LikeLike
Apneaman
/ June 10, 2014http://www.desdemonadespair.net/
LikeLike
Andy (in San Diego)
/ June 10, 2014I’ve been watching / reading signs of ecosystems collapsing and shifting. Nature corrects itself, but at it’s own pace not ours. Great link Apneaman.
LikeLike
Apneaman
/ June 10, 2014[Part 1] Exposé | The 2º Death Dance – The 1º Cover-up
http://thebiggestlieevertold.wordpress.com/2010/12/10/part-1-expose-the-2%C2%BA-death-dance-%E2%80%93-the-1%C2%BA-cover-up/
LikeLike
Andy (in San Diego)
/ June 10, 2014I remember reading many years ago that the upper limit for CO2 was something like 350, then was bumped up to 375, and so on. I don’t have reference to those limits and when they were, and I almost don’t believe myself now as we keep getting pounded by the “new number” until we get too close to it (then bump it up again). I wish I had kept numbers and rough dates, but that is 20/20 hind sight.
I believe this is done to keep populations under control. Humans would be less docile if told “you screwed the pooch, you’ve gone beyond the limit. Now we’ll see ecology get wrecked, your crops will die and so will a bunch of you”.
I suspect we’ll be seeing more mollification to keep populations from reacting as a group. But it may become more and more difficult to keep the charade working.
LikeLike
utoutback
/ June 10, 2014Apneaman
Thank you for this interesting and enlightening review of how invested parties (govts., individuals and corporations) co-opted the climate change discussions and led us into our present cul-de-sac.
At this point I respond to people who ask me about climate change, that I view it as “natural history” with humanity being no different than an ant hill or community of kelp (or perhaps bacteria). The fact that we have a brain hasn’t seemed to make a difference to our continued focus on short term self interest. While some of us our outliers, I have come to believe our species still functions from “fight or flight” reactionary responses. Thus proactive behavior takes a back seat to short term profit, mitigation/adaptation and crisis management.
Sigh.
LikeLike
Baker
/ June 10, 2014Would you like to write about the heavy heatwave and thunderstorms in Central Europe? Measures in south-western Germany climbed up to 100°F (e.g. city of Karlsruhe – hottest day in June on record, since 1876). Yesterday there was a MCC with bow echo, quite rare here, with destructive downbursts up to 150 km/h in Düsseldorf and other complexes the days before with large hail near Brussels and Paris… It still continues today and tomorrow.. see http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27776189
LikeLike
Bernard
/ June 11, 2014For those looking for extra info, the Estofex archive has good insight:
http://www.estofex.org/cgi-bin/polygon/showforecast.cgi?list=yes
LikeLike
Gerald Spezio
/ June 10, 2014Apneaman, I followed your direction to Cory Morningstar & was flabbergasted by her depth & insight – most of it done 3 to 4 years ago.
In January 2011 she told us much.
http://thebiggestlieevertold.wordpress.com/2011/01/17/the-real-weapons-of-mass-destruction-methane-propaganda-the-architects-of-genocide-part-iii/
I’ve been banned by flying CO2 spewing yuppie hypocrite Guy McPherson.
Flying for “grief counseling” for Chrissake, Guy.
LikeLike
dtlange
/ June 10, 2014I shudder as I think of the poetic karma of the third item on the list of GHG sources. Fore behind CO2 and methane is nitrogen, azote… the absence if life.
az•ote
[az-oht, ey-zoht, uh-zoht]
noun Chemistry .
nitrogen.
Origin:
1785–95; < French < Greek ázōtos ungirt, taken to mean lifeless
"Nitrogen fertilizer can contribute to greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural fields. This, in turn, can impact the climate and cause temperatures to warm. These fertilizers spur gas emissions by stimulating microbes in the soil to produce more nitrous oxide, which is the third most important greenhouse gas behind carbon dioxide and methane. In addition, it also destroys stratospheric ozone.
In all, agriculture accounts for about 80 percent of human-caused nitrous oxide emissions worldwide. These emissions have increased significantly in recent years, mostly due to nitrogen fertilizer use…"
http://www.scienceworldreport.com/articles/15312/20140610/nitrogen-based-fertilizer-impacts-climate-much-agriculture.htm
LikeLike
dtlange
/ June 10, 2014The MSU press release re nitrogen: http://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2014/how-much-fertilizer-is-too-much-for-the-climate/
LikeLike
Andy (in San Diego)
/ June 11, 2014Does anyone have any information on the median cumulative annual ice addition to the Greenland ice sheet? I’ve looked around and haven’t seen anything on it. I’m curious as to how much this discharge calving accounts for (in terms of annual accumulation).
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 11, 2014Would someone have a look at this and give comment
http://preppingforexile.blogspot.com.au/2014/06/oxygen.html
I know that for a lot of people the view is that this is a terminal event, but I am of the opinion that if we can plan for a colony on Mars then we should be able to survive here … with appropriate planning.
The important thing is to be prepared for what we are able to foresee coming. So that is what I am trying to do, for my kids sake.
LikeLike
Doug
/ June 11, 2014“I don’t want to live on Mars” is a recent Ziggy Marley song. I think we ought to listen to him.
But, I do think the elite (billionaire) club is starting the early phases of planning an exodus off Earth, as far fetched as that sounds to some people. I am afraid that energies and dollars will be put to this immoral idea, instead of directing it towards making this a livable world. I think these people need to be stopped. If we can’t even keep this planet livable for us, we have no right exporting the virus that we are, to other worlds. If we can’t fix things down here, we deserve to go extinct. And the rich capatalist assholes who are more responsible for creating global warming than anyone else, should above all else not be allowed a chance at colonizing space.
LikeLike
Apneaman
/ June 11, 2014I say let em go and good fuckin riddance. I bet it would be fun just listening to the worlds richest egos arguing over who gets to ride shotgun.
LikeLike
Tom
/ June 11, 2014Paul: I don’t think there’s any prepping (that will be effective) for what’s coming. Loss of habitat will make life impossible in the near future for us and most everything else that’s living (heat, climate change and radiation, not to mention the chemistry of the atmosphere, soil and oceans, which are all out of balance, will create conditions intolerable to life).
Live now and as long as you can, but realize the very way we live – all of the systems we’ve put in place to foster human development – has depleted our host and that our time is almost up (because we failed to heed the warnings of scientists, philosophers, writers, artists and some spiritual people to become stewards of the planet and live in balance with it all, and now it’s too late and we can’t get it back).
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 12, 2014Prepping is perhaps a limited term as culturally it has gained a connotation of an individual or a family unit preparing for some temporary disaster. Obviously what we are facing is far beyond that, though I lack an appropriate word for what is required.
As far as philosophers and writers go, Asimov, in my opinion, is the pinnacle for SF. The foundation series had the planet Trantor with melted ice caps. The people lived in underground cities, nutrients provided by highly developed algae farms. Power came from geo-thermal and nuclear options. I would add solar panels and electrolysis to produce hydrogen.
I agree that we can’t get it back, but we can adapt.
LikeLike
pintada
/ June 11, 2014Paul from NSW:
The amount of O2 in the air is pretty much out of our individual control especially when it comes to preparation/survivalism. I have HEPA filters for the smokey days that we have here every summer now, but that is another matter entirely. Also, humans can live at very high altitude – 18,000 feet – so by the time there is so little O2 in the atmosphere that people can’t live …. Actually, I’ll bet you that we would be just fine if the O2 did go to 10% (all things being equal which of course they wouldn’t be).
Part of prepping is determining what we are worried about, and what we can do. If the problem is vast and deadly (e.g. a big astroid, or if the arctic methane clathrates all melt ) there is no point in even considering it. Just find a nice place to watch.
I am preparing for 4C and the concomitant issues. I don’t have time for O2 depletion (not gonna be an issue), chem trails (not real), government (irrelevant if you keep your head down), sea level rise (I live in the mountains).
Tom may be perfectly correct – and it is his choice to play the grasshopper. For all we know that might be the “winning” strategy.
LikeLike
pintada
/ June 11, 2014Paul from NSW said: “… if we can plan for a colony on Mars then we should be able to survive here … with appropriate planning.”
Sorry, gotta disagree with that statement.
If present trends continue (and why wouldn’t they) the Arctic Ocean will melt, and then sufficient methane clathrates will melt to recreate conditions like the PETM.
[We have pumped about 1000 Gt C as CO2 already.]
(see summaries in Panchuk et al. 2008; Zeebe et al. 2009). These authors show that one can account for the changes [creating the PETM] by invoking the addition of about 3000–6000 Gt C as CO2, in the range of estimates from d13C.
“Zeebe et al. (2009) worked backward, using the changes in carbonate compensation depth and seawater d13C to calculate the magnitude of the CO2 release and its d13C. They calculated a magnitude of 3000 Gt C …”
[BUT, if you are dumping in CH4 the tonnage required is greatly reduced]
“… cause CH4 to be released to seawater. The observed d13C change at the onset of the PETM limits the resulting C flux to 1300–3300 Gt C,
“… the modern CH4 hydrate reservoir contains 8000–15,000 Gt C; the Paleocene reservoir would have been smaller because
methane hydrates are less stable when ocean temperatures are warmer. …”
[The result in the PETM was profound and not survivable. And we are doing it much faster.]
“… over which CO2 was added, extending from the previous d13C baseline to the time of minimum d13C, has been estimated to be about 10,000 years. The duration of the entire PETM is thought to have been about 200 Kyr. …”
“The temperature rise seems to have been about 5C in the tropics and 8C at high latitudes, with considerable uncertainty. Warming in the deep sea, inferred from the d18O of benthic forams, was typically about 5C (Nunes and Norris 2006).”
“… temperatures in the tropics reached simulated values of
35–40C or more, is a task for future research.”
[If so, then the wet bulb temp of 35C which we cannot survive was the minimum AVERAGE in the tropics for 200,000 years. ]
Bender, Michael L. (2013-08-25). Paleoclimate (Princeton Primers in Climate). Princeton University Press.
So, with proper planning, one would set up an underground bunker where you would raise all your food, manufacture all the clothing you would need, generate electricity for lighting, manufacture replacement light bulbs, etc.. And you (and your decedents) would live there for 200,000 years.
Nah.
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 12, 2014I replied, but I think I had too many links so it got sent to moderation purgatory.
I’ll try again
Hi Pintaba, interesting comment.
As rapidly as this is occurring it will not be instantaneous. Therefore, with adequate planning we can adapt.
From my understanding the PETM resulted in dwarfism in mammals (http://westerndigs.org/global-warming-caused-dwarfism-in-ancient-american-mammals-fossils-show/), 30% in fact, not the annihilation of all mammals. We have the biotechnology, or will have soon, to select (or mutate) for dwarfism. If that is possible, then humans could adapt. Here are 2 examples where humans have evolved to suit different environments;
Homo Floresiensis. Dwarf primitive people. Just for arguments sake I am going to take the average height of females at 167cm, LB1 was 110cm. That is 65%, damn close to the 30% reduction mentioned earlier.
The Yaghan indians. These, on the other hand, evolved to handle colder temperatures through a metabolism change. I think they were first documented by Darwin.
Secondly the way I see it, a re-occurrence of the PETM would result in areas that are inhospitable to humans, but not all. At 3C (the beginning, not the end), you have large areas that would be inhospitable, in summer. Anybody not prepared would have little chance of surviving. So they will migrate.
Initially those areas (Southern Chile, Antartica, Greenland etc) that are survivable in a heat events would be very violent and dangerous places. Given the over population, lack of skills, infrastructure, poor soil and resources it would be hell on Earth.
However, a society that had prepared, was structured, and was willing to wait would ultimately be rewarded, without firing a shot. At 4-6C, then it is time to move, depending on the community’s location.
If, while being fully forewarned, we condemn our children, that to me is unacceptable. But I will be the first to admit, we can’t do it alone.
LikeLike
pintada
/ June 12, 2014Hi Paul;
>> “I replied, but I think I had too many links so it got sent to moderation purgatory. I’ll try again”
Yes, there are some strange things that happen in the WordPress world. For example, i can comment on my own comment, but i cannot comment on yours. No worries.
>> “As rapidly as this is occurring it will not be instantaneous. Therefore, with adequate planning we can adapt.”
Yes indeed it is in fact a geologic process and so will take time. In fact, re-reading Bender to make the previous post gave me some useful perspective again. I wish you had said, “with adequate planning [and a little luck] … “. But yes, it isn’t hopeless.
>> “We have the biotechnology, or will have soon, to select (or mutate) for dwarfism.”
This is where we get off the same page. You appear to be (if i may read between the lines a bit) making the mistake of focusing on AGW and not considering the other issues that we face. The continued march of technology is not assured – in fact, continued technological “progress” beyond 2020 is highly doubtful in my mind.
1. Everything I read (that isn’t pure drivel or propaganda) regarding the fracking bubble indicates that it will pop as early as 2016 but no later than 2020. When it does, it will be serious and permanent. I won’t say that it will be the end or anything like the end of industrial civilization, but it will be a step down the ratchet or stairway that leads to the bottom of this civilizations end. Technological progress depends on a functioning economy.
2. If our technological society does continue – after all, they could do in-situ coal gasification to get the petrochemicals needed – the maximum temperature faced by our decedents would go up, likely way up. Consider again the options available to a person living on a planet where the average temp in the tropics is 40C.
3. There are other issues that are working to end industrial “progress” that I will only mention. Food scarcity, ocean acidification (jellyfish), fresh water scarcity, generalized over population, civil unrest, etc.
4. extinct |ikˈstiNG(k)t| adjective
(of a species, family, or other larger group) having no living members: trilobites and dinosaurs are extinct. • no longer in existence:
The term “extinction” is not used precisely. The question raised by those who use it imprecisely on purpose is, “At what point does it stop mattering whether a species is extant or if the term extinct is more useful? When there is 10000 pairs, 4000?” If a creature can thrive in a wet bulb hell of 40C and subsist on jellyfish is it still human?
I would like my descendants to catch a break. I would love it if something crashed our civilization now, right now. If we stopped discharging CO2 now, a 2C – 3C world would likely be available to them. Under those conditions, they could still farm, they could still be human in form and physiology, and some of the existing natural world would be there. If technological/industrial society is allowed to persist to its natural end, we will do the coal gasification and the end temp will be 8-12C higher than present (methane would be the driver). There is no way to spin that to make it positive.
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 13, 2014Hi Pintada,
I absolutely agree that this will come at us fast and hard. But I am convinced we can survive it [with luck]. According to the studies on Thermogeddon, I would say that much of the tropics is lost. So I am not factoring attempting survival in those areas into the equation.
There are many factors that need to be dealt with and key to this is ongoing technological development, that in turn relies on a number of topics but not in the least solar, biogas, hydrogen, 3D printing, aquaponics and logistics chains. (Which I am attempting to cover on my site).
Regarding size, we don’t need a medical breakthrough (well we do, if we wanted to mutate). I don’t want to get banned so I want to make it clear that some of these solutions for size are unpleasant and ethically dangerous, that is why a safe mutation would be preferable. Realistically though, I doubt a mutation could ever be achieved without some unintended negative side-effect.
When the choice is for the extinction of man or at best the reduction of man back to the stone age and all the violence that that implies, some radical discussions are warranted. That is why I am offering the following;
Calorie restriction. Calorie restriction reduces body mass and lowers metabolism. Therefore it reduces body temperature. It’s a tough pill to swallow.
There is already a treatable condition called Acromegaly (search the Mayo clinic). Acromegaly is a hormonal disorder that develops when your pituitary gland produces too much growth hormone during adulthood. There are a variety of treatments for it. Could those treatments be used to artificially reduce growth?
Realistically though, that would need applied early in life to kids that are above the average height for their age. Though who knows what the side-effects might be. Obviously this is hugely contentious topic. It would take a very hostile environment before I would give my kids any sort of drug.
Next is natural selection. Natural selection takes eons. That would be a burden on any community.
Unnatural selection. There is no way I would ever condone an aggressive selection process. It would make us no better than the Nazis. Also I don’t believe in the servitude of women. So why bring it up? In a community where everybody was a parent to every child, and that it was accepted moral and cultural practice, encouraged “partnerships” have been used for centuries. If you look at the variety of forms within domesticated pets you can see the power of encouraged partnerships. Sounds foreign and it is. But survival would depend on having children that could survive.
Lastly, perhaps it should be firstly, I see adoption. All things considered, this is ethically the most attractive. Adoption on the basis of body structure, and other traits. Which stated or otherwise is how it works now anyway. There will be a human tide of suffering, rather than add to it, wouldn’t it be better to help some of them?
So initially the cooling of a body mass for the current generation would need to be dealt with using current technologies. Those technologies will eventually breakdown, the next generation will have to look at things differently. That will be an ethical issue for them to resolve. To cool the body using current technology would require a number of other techniques covered in the “Body temperature” post on my site (http://preppingforexile.blogspot.com.au/2014/05/body-temperature.html). I am hoping that people will post suggestions that I can add to within the content.
Correctly planned for, we are not going extinct, we will adapt. But there is a truly positive spin on this. Should humanity survive, the lessons we will have learned from the history of our foolishness, would surely give us spiritual wings. Is a bird any less an animal for having evolved from a maniraptoran dinosaur? I say it is more, because it has a better perspective.
Again, I hope that none of this is taken offensively. It is meant as an ethical discussion on planned adaptation.
LikeLike
pintada
/ June 13, 2014Hey Paul:
>> “Again, I hope that none of this is taken offensively. It is meant as an ethical discussion on planned adaptation.”
I can’t imagine that any reasonable person (i.e. not a ideologue or paid denialist) would be offended by a thoughtful dialog. It is my opinion that your tendency to believe in technology is not fashionable on these sites (e.g. here, “archdruid”, http://collapseofindustrialcivilization.com), but technological “progress” will be with us for the near future so it should be considered, fashion not withstanding.
I think that i can show that for even a large amount of warming – but less than ~6C – temperature vis-a-vis human physiology, like O2 depletion, is not an important issue compared to the other things that would go on.
I might as well do so at your blog.
LikeLike
pintada
/ June 13, 2014Sorry Paul, i cannot post a comment at your blog. I suspect a bug there, but no idea.
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 13, 2014Pintada, Hopefully, the comment section is now working on preppingforexile
LikeLike
pintada
/ June 15, 2014>> “Pintada, Hopefully, the comment section is now working on preppingforexile”
Nope. I saw some new options for login didn’t matter BTW and for what its worth, i prefer Disqus.
I doubt that Robert will mind if I put it here. This is part 1.
Paul, I will quote only those things that I want to talk about to save space, no offense intended.
>> “According to the studies on Thermogeddon, I would say that much of the tropics is lost. So I am not factoring attempting survival in those areas into the equation.”
I was not aware of the “barringtonstewart” site, but with just a little perusal i see quotes from FoxNews and Roy Spencer – not a good omen. On the other hand, the thermogeddon article by Hazel Muir seemed very reasonable to me given what I know. Thus, the tropics are not a good location for future survival. Besides, I like 4 seasons. We are on the same page so far. 🙂
>> “There are many factors that need to be dealt with and key to this is ongoing technological development, that in turn relies on a number of topics but not in the least solar, biogas, hydrogen, 3D printing, aquaponics and logistics chains. (Which I am attempting to cover on my site).”
solar – waste of time except for a personal power source since the EROI is only 2.6. It might improve, but for it to get over 8 would take a lot of work, luck, and time. I doubt that it would ever reach 10 which is the minimum for a viable power source for industrial civilization.
biogas/biodiesel – The problem is in the bio part. If you can’t raise food, why would you have plant material for conversion to gas? Both processes require vast amounts of water, land, and nutrients. The EROEI is 1 or less.
hydrogen – LOL
3D printing – Despite what Kurzweil and crew think this tech is all hype and no substance. If I had $100,000 for one, maybe. Look around your house, and find something that you would need to survive that could be made with a $2000 printer out of the plastics available. I did that exercise and found nothing. I had a relay go out on my water system yesterday. Would a 3D printer help me? No.
aquaponics – Given the proper conditions at your homestead absolutely.
logistics chains – no civilization, no logistics needed.
Obviously, i am throwing down a gauntlet (gauntlets?) but thats where i am with those ideas. Please prove me wrong. 🙂
>> “Regarding size …”
>> “Calorie restriction. Calorie restriction reduces body mass and lowers metabolism. Therefore it reduces body temperature. It’s a tough pill to swallow.”
It’s a tough pill to swallow …. so to speak. LOL
End part 1
LikeLike
pintada
/ June 16, 2014Part 2
Most of your comment is about altering humanity to handle heat, and in a previous comment you mentioned Asimov’s book about living underground. I want to hear a defense of that position … its the best way i learn.
I think that your premise which seems to be that the earth will warm up – and keep warming up, and that the heat will be the main problem. I disagree (if i understand you correctly). Your ethical question will never become an issue.
There will be hot days, sure.
(A city in China probably saw a wet bulb temperature of 33C last summer. Per official Chinese news sources 24 people died, all of whom were migrant construction workers. Let that rattle around in your BS detector for a while.)
But our civilization is facing more problems than heat. In fact it is the least of our problems.
1. The Hadley Cells are growing and the desertification south of ~30 degrees north and north of ~30 degrees south is growing more intense. This has caused and will continue to cause civil strife that threatens the oil supply via several mechanisms (Iran, Iraq, Syria, Egypt) and upsets the food supply directly (India, Australia, China, Mexico, southern US & California, Southern Brazil, Argentina).
2. This civilization has reached a point in its increasing complexity that there is a diminishing return to capital and other investments (Tainter, 1988)
3. There is a tremendous risk of running out of food very soon, for many reasons including stupid water management. (Brown, 2012)
4. Ocean acidification. (Callum Robers, 2012)
5. Peak oil (Richard Heinberg)
6. etc. (I can bore you with more if you wish later.)
As a result of these issues, and because of the ability of people to live in really crazy conditions, I contend that the actual temperature will not become a (major*) killer until most everyone is dead from other causes – especially starvation, and war.
Needless to say, Asimov was a great writer of sic-fi/fantasy, but there will be no technology, and no economy with which to build underground cities ( LOL ), and there will be no biotechnology for modifying anyones physiology by the time things get sorted out.
In my opinion it is possible to prepare:
A. Learn to grow your own food – big subject
B. Do grief work – get ready to loose everything and die gracefully.
C. Be excellent to each other.
* “Major” means >1 billion dead.
End part 2
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 16, 2014Hi Pintaba,
I will have to split this into a number of smaller replies in order to be able to post links in response.
I think I will move the blog across to a wiki so that others can participate in formulating a plan.
But let me state that I don’t really expect the majority of the Earth’s population to survive. You are right, this is not just about heat. Heat stress is one of many issues. Any strategy I am looking at is really for the survival of small related communities.
I adhere to Mr Scribblers view that this will end up in a collapse at 20 years. But I do not have any doubt though regarding what the wealthy will do to survive, and how they will look to profit from the situation.
There is a definite precedent for under ground cities, N. Korea. During the Korean war the US dropped 635,000 tons of bombs, and 32,557 tons of napalm on the North. During that time it is estimated that 12-15% of the population were killed. What did they do? To escape the bombing, entire factories were moved underground, along with schools, hospitals, government offices, and much of the population. … Peasants hid underground during the day and came out to farm at night. Any wonder they hold a grudge?
Logistics chains are still viable without “civilization” on the scale we are used to. Smaller communities can still trade skills and produce. There is evidence of trade in the stone age.
According to energy.gov Hydrogen is not viable only because oil is so cheap.
All you need with Solar is enough power to run a small aircon long enough to survive a heatwave. That, and to slowly generate hydrogen via electrolysis, if it is feasible. I live in the mountains, the temperature here drops dramatically at night. So a heat event will need to be handled during the day (when there is sunlight).
Biogas, on the http://preppingforexile.blogspot.com.au/ site you will see lots of options for producing food at extreme heat, and low light. We only require vast amounts of land because we get our calories from inefficient food sources.
I hope I answered some of your questions effectively. I don’t mind gauntlets being thrown down, this really needs to be challenged now, because later on there is going to be little room for error.
LikeLike
pintada
/ June 16, 2014>> “There is a definite precedent for under ground cities, …”
I never said that it was not possible to build underground cities, it is. Just as it is possible (yet) to launch rockets to Mars. What I said is that it isn’t practical for maintaining any sort of complex civilization. The words complex and civilization are important here (Tainter, 1988 – I won’t define the terms, I assume that you have read the book. If you have not read him, I strongly suggest that you do).
>> “Logistics chains are still viable without “civilization” on the scale we are used to.”
Sorry man, this is simply not true. How does one set up a global logistics chain without petrol?
>> “Smaller communities can still trade skills and produce. There is evidence of trade in the stone age.”
Grog – “Grog has wheat.”
Biff – “Biff have eggs.”
Grog – “Me want eggs. You want wheat?
Yes, of course, the above conversation can happen in a 4C world, but I have never heard the above conversation referred to as a “logistics chain”.
>> “According to energy.gov Hydrogen is not viable only because oil is so cheap.”
What is the EROEI for H2?
Will you make it from CH4? If so what is your point?
Will you use solar (EROI of 3-7) to perform electrolysis and then use the H2 to run a motor on your homestead? Why not use the electricity directly?
Do you imagine preserving technological civilization this way? If so, I’m back to LOL.
>> “All you need with Solar is enough power to run a small aircon long enough to survive a heatwave. That, and to slowly generate hydrogen via electrolysis, if it is feasible. I live in the mountains, the temperature here drops dramatically at night. So a heat event will need to be handled during the day (when there is sunlight).”
There is a difference between me and mine surviving, and having a civilization. If my group makes it long enough to face a killer heat wave where we have settled, then sleeping in our root cellar might become an option. Without civilization, there will be no AC (air conditioning 🙂 ).
A short story is appropriate here. I got a flat tire on my wheel barrow. Then I bought a tube from Grainger (a US logistics chain company), and fixed the flat. Easy peasy. But, after a certain point in the collapse, I will not be able to get tubes. I can and have purchased spares, but eventually each of them will fail in turn and we will be without a wheel barrow. My children or grandchildren will be carrying dirt in baskets on their heads. Air conditioning? No fracking way.
>> “We only require vast amounts of land because we get our calories from inefficient food sources.”
This statement is a myth. Please, explain to me how you raise 5000 acres of wheat more efficiently than your neighbor. I would love to be rich, and you would certainly make me rich if you can share.
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 17, 2014Next point.
“What is the EROEI for H2?
Will you make it from CH4? If so what is your point?
Will you use solar (EROI of 3-7) to perform electrolysis and then use the H2 to run a motor on your homestead? Why not use the electricity directly?
Do you imagine preserving technological civilization this way?”
It seems to me that the calculations regarding EROI are for our current civilization, and so can be misleading. I don’t really think using methane to generate hydrogen makes much point. Methane does have its place, however, let’s look at solar and wind electrolysis to generate hydrogen. Certainly, the electricity could be used directly, and I agree that that should be done. However, usage would be variable and excess is wasted, I can’t really see batteries being a long term solution for storage. Electrolysis would allow that excess to be stored in the form of hydrogen. Hydrogen would be easier to store in a cost effective manner when you only have to support a small community.
Preserving technological civilization is vastly easier than preserving the energy requirements of 9 billion people (2050). Imagine the civilization reduced to 1 billion, the economic calculations change. We have to hold technological civilization together by forming smaller semi-autonomous communities, think Kibbutz style. The energy requirements for industry would be reduced, significantly.
Certainly the pace would slow down, probably dramatically. But I don’t think that is a bad thing. Here are my thoughts on a community system http://preppingforexile.blogspot.com.au/2014/06/community-economic-viability.html
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014If you have a surplus of low cost energy during peak times you can even store the hydrogen cryogenically.
Current Solar EROI is comparable to to current nat gas EROI. Wind EROI is currently superior to nat gas EROI. Of course, EROI is lost in storage, but if you have surplus, then storage is a net gain overall and outside of EROI considerations.
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 19, 2014I agree, though it seems to me the liquefaction of hydrogen from renewable sources has a couple of drawbacks. It would require considerable energy to cool it, and it would require a big investment to make the processing plants. I guess, it is yet another reason why we cannot afford to continue with business as usual until the whole system collapses.
On a smaller community scale taking solar and wind excess inputs and storing them locally as gas is fairly low-tech, and as you stated it changes the EROI calculations. In addition, the use of waste digesters and the local storage and use of the resulting methane makes sense to me.
Perhaps I don’t understand those EROI calculations well enough, but they do not seem to include the cost to the environment, rather it is purely a physics calculation. In my mind we need something more complete from a sustainable perspective analogous to the triple bottom line in business accounting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_bottom_line. Are you aware of such a formula?
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 19, 2014The EROI calls are a broad measure. In general, they bias toward ff as they calculate at the well head or mine but do not add efficiency loss due to burning in an engine or power plant for example.
In addition solar EROI benefits greatly from manufacturing scaling and innovation. Wind does as well, but to a lesser degree. So EROI for these are on a growth path while that for ff is declining due to depletion and loss of ease of access.
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 19, 2014Very interesting, thanks for the info.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 19, 2014Also, other promising methods of storage include compressed air…
LikeLike
pintada
/ June 16, 2014Here Paul – Mr. Heinberg explains exactly what I was trying to describe. Plus, he has credentials!
http://www.resilience.org/stories/2014-06-16/want-to-change-the-world-read-this-first
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 17, 2014Hi Pintaba,
Great article, and it aligns perfectly with my thoughts. Life as we know it is over. From the article;
“There’s no hard and fast rule, but your idea stands a good chance if it assumes we are moving toward a societal regime with less energy and less transport (and that is therefore more localized); if it can work in a world where climate is changing and weather conditions are extreme and unpredictable; if it provides a way to sequester carbon rather than releasing more into the atmosphere; and if it helps people meet their basic needs during hard times.”
So let’s tackle the foreseeable problems and the potential solutions. I don’t foresee anything remotely like our modern complex civilization lasting for more than my generation. Let’s drop that from the conversation entirely as a final goal, we agree, it’s not going to happen. A lot of possibilities depend on how quickly the general population realizes that this is where we are headed. In addition, some solutions will be viable in the short term, but not for the next generation. The challenge is to get past the first die back.
OK, so your question “How does one set up a global logistics chain without petrol?” A view possibilities as I see them are here. http://preppingforexile.blogspot.com.au/2014/05/logistics.html
LikeLike
pintada
/ June 17, 2014>> “the answer for replacement parts lies in 3D printing. Over the next decade there will be few things that cannot be replicated with 3D printing provided you have the raw materials and the know-how.”
We are not having a conversation.
I pointed out that I could not find anything at my place that I could build with a 3D printer that would matter. I gave the example of an inner tube for my wheel barrow. Please post a link to a 3D printer – for any price – that would allow me to print an inner tube.
While fixing my tire, i ruined a bolt. Please find me a 3D printer for less than $100K that will make a bolt.
I need a level control relay. 3D printer to the rescue? NO
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 17, 2014Hi Pintaba,
Think about it. If a community bought a 3D printer capable of printing a bolt, do you think they would be financially successful? I think there might be some confusion with the idea of going it alone vs community living. If we try and survive separately we are gone. Advanced Manufacturing Services in Sydney currently offer 3D printing of metal parts. Jinan Xintian Technology Co., Ltd. in China offer a 3D metal laser printer for $10,000. This is not pie in the sky stuff, and it is readily available to a community. Prices are dropping fast.
In 1919 Holden started manufacturing car bodies in Australia. At that time there were roughly 5 million people. The business was very successful. Now we are at 24 million and the car industry is dying due to imports.
At the time it was established there were no prior skills here. So everything was learned. Once the logistics chains start to become much more expensive, then community manufacturing will boom. Personally I do not believe the logistics chains will fail completely, they will just become more and more expensive.
The issue will be in the preparation.
LikeLike
pintada
/ June 17, 2014>> “Electrolysis would allow that excess to be stored in the form of hydrogen. Hydrogen would be easier to store in a cost effective manner when you only have to support a small community.”
Paul, to use the H2 you would need to pressurize it. That requires a pump, and electric motor, and a storage medium. Currently, H2 is stored in steel tanks at 3000 – 4000 psi and at that pressure, the H2 escapes the tank through the steel in just a few weeks.
So, how are you proposing to maintain the pump? 3D printing?
Show me a 3D printer that can print a stainless steel piston for pressurizing H2 that can also print all the parts needed to keep the 3D printer working. How does a 3D printer decide where to put stuff. A computer.
Show me a 3D printer that can print a computer chip.
You are hanging your entire plan on 3D printing. It won’t work.
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 17, 2014Pintaba,
“Show me a 3D printer that can print a computer chip.”
Come on Pintaba, Google is your friend.
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 17, 2014Hi Pintaba,
Hydrogen does not have to be pressurized for storage. That is a requirement for efficient shipping. I am not talking about shipping it, but rather using it locally. There are many low tech solutions for local storage of methane and hydrogen, have a look on the instructables site. There are some very clever people there.
One I particularly like is the equivalent of a weighted upside down bucket in water. There is an inline with a check valve, the outline runs through a little tank to eliminate flashback. When you want to use it you simply open a valve on the outline and apply pressure.
In saying that there are a lot of other precautions that need to be dealt with. Like with methane digesters it would probably be recommended that the storage be buried and removed from dwellings. But they are not deal breakers by any means.
LikeLike
pintada
/ June 19, 2014Very interesting Paul. Sounds like you’ve got it all figured out! Good luck.
LikeLike
rayduray
/ June 11, 2014NASA’s Earth Observatory has an article up about the recent calving.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=83837&eocn=home&eoci=iotd_title
LikeLike
Griffin
/ June 11, 2014The tone of the article strikes me as a little odd. It seems to be almost written in response to the post on the Arctic Sea Ice Blog (which happens listed as a reference). It is natural that they would like to keep the upper hand in being viewed as the all-knowing experts but this just struck me as a bit elitist in it’s tone. To state that such a calving event is “not unusual” is stretching the truth. Calving events, like car crashes, are not unusual. But the equivalent of a 300 car pileup on a superfreeway that has had the speed limit removed should get a little more attention from NASA I would think. Is it just me?
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 11, 2014Can the CEOs of energy companies get any more evil than this? Yes, I suppose they can…
“Coal Company CEO Threatens To Sue EPA For ‘Lying’ About Climate Change”
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/06/10/3447370/murray-coal-warming-is-fake/
LikeLike
Apneaman
/ June 11, 2014Yes they can and will. Power never gives up. I think in the near future climate change will split America even further apart. Unfortunately, they have created an army of ideological zealots (white, male, conservatives) and they will direct them at anyone who gets in their way. Everyone thinks the deniers are just plain stupid, but it’s much more than that. Their whole world view and sense of control is at stake. Also, they now have to fear retribution. Think what will happen when millions wake up and realize that much of the death and suffering could have been prevented, if not for greed. If your grandchild dies in a heatwave in the near future are you going to be satisfied with an apology from Rex Tillerson or Anthony Watts or anyone? How many will want to punish those they feel are guilty? The Deniers and their masters are too heavily invested to back out now. They will not stop of their own accord.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 11, 2014Early Summer Heat Broils Northern Hemisphere
While the summer has started off relatively cool for the eastern two-thirds of the U.S. many other locations in the world have been broiling the past several weeks. Record or near-record heat has been observed in portions of Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Russia, India, Nepal, China, Japan, Korea, Libya, Chad, and Mexico. Here’s a brief summary of the highlights.
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/weatherhistorian/comment.html?entrynum=280
LikeLike
climatehawk1
/ June 11, 2014Thanks, tweet scheduled on this.
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 11, 2014Really good summary. Especially for those of us in the eastern two-thirds of the US, where people are saying (not me) “where’s the blogal warming”?
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 11, 2014‘BLOGAL WARMING’ – As experienced by readers of this blog, are periods when Robert puts out a series of excellent articles in such rapid succession that you get caught off guard. In attempting to read the comments in 3 recent threads, your computer overheats, so you decide to grab a cold one and take a dip in a lake before coming back. That’s ‘blogal warming’ for you. We’re in a rare cool phase recently, but alas that’ll pass.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 11, 2014Flooding in Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina, with record rainfall and rivers’ swelling
The Iguazu and Parana rivers that Brazil shares with Paraguay and Argentina rose to historic levels, forcing authorities to open two major hydroelectric dams above the world-renowned Iguazu Falls, where the water flow increased nearly 30-fold, from 1,500 cubic meters per second to 43,000 meters per second, topping the previous record of 36,000 set in 1992.
Link
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 11, 2014UAH Lower Troposphere: Warmest 10-year Period on Record
UAH’s May anomaly for the lower troposphere is +0.33°C, the 3rd-warmest May in their records.
It also makes the last 10 years (120 months) the warmest in their records (error bars excluded):
http://davidappell.blogspot.com/2014/06/uah-lower-troposphere-warmest-10-year.html
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 11, 2014Bob,
Could you explain what ‘UAH’ stands for, and the significance of this finding for those of us still catching up on all the climate and weather terminology?
Thanks much and for all the links!
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 11, 2014University of Alabama Huntsville .
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 11, 2014the significance of this finding …………..
Roy Spencer runs this satellite data set , he’s a creationist / denier . The irony, oh the irony .
LikeLike
todaysguestis
/ June 11, 2014India’s Heat Wave Is Unbearable
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/06/11/india_s_heat_wave_is_unbearable_extreme_temperatures_in_new_delhi_mumbai.html
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 11, 2014I hope the monsoon advances a bit quicker and provides some relief there soon.
LikeLike
Gerald Spezio
/ June 11, 2014My skilled dentist did his early dental training in India at U of Bombay (now Mumbai).
He relocated to the U.S. in the 1980s, & finished more grad training.
A few days ago when I queried him about the heat wave in India, he didn’t even know that it was happening.
LikeLike
Apneaman
/ June 11, 2014On a more hopeful note.
Bloomberg: Americans 2-1 Will Pay More for Electricity to Combat Climate Change. Not that They have to, but Nice to Know.
June 11, 2014
The fallacy implied by the headline is that clean, renewable electricity costs more than dirty, mercury laced, climate killing coal. But, even assuming that, a majority are saying they’d pay more for a livable planet. Go figure.
http://climatecrocks.com/2014/06/11/bloomberg-americans-2-1-will-pay-more-for-electricity-to-combat-climate-change-not-that-they-have-to-but-nice-to-know/#more-19443
LikeLike
colinc
/ June 11, 2014People say a lot of things! How and where did Bloomberg conduct that poll? Are the millions of homeless people willing to pay more? How about the nearly homeless that are already having a hard time paying the bills? Perhaps the millions of recent college grads with 5-6 digit debt and no job are willing to pay more? I call shenanigans! I don’t know a single person who even wants to know there is a problem let alone pay more to “combat” it. Peter Sinclair is the opposite kind of “denier.” He doesn’t have his head in the sand, it’s in the clouds expecting ‘Miracle Day.’
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 11, 2014Extreme weather to occur more often around Indian Ocean rim
A double whammy of weird ocean behavior washed over the world in 1997. The Pacific Ocean had already succumbed to an exceptionally strong El Niño, and then the Indian Ocean was hit fiercely by El Niño’s close cousin: the so-called Indian Ocean Dipole. Surface waters off the coast of Indonesia cooled and the ocean’s predominant westerly winds reversed, leading to catastrophic weather. Fires raged across a drought-stricken Indonesia, and floods across east African nations killed thousands.
Climate change could make years like 1997 come more often, according to a new study of the Indian Ocean Dipole cycle, which alternates between two opposite extremes, positive and negative, just as El Niño does with La Niña. The study suggests that rising greenhouse gases will cause extreme positive dipole events—like the one that struck the Indian Ocean in 1997—to occur three times as often this century as they did in the 20th century, or about once every 6 years, as opposed to once every 17 years.
Link
LikeLike
Apneaman
/ June 12, 2014AUSTRALIANS FOR COAL
LikeLike
pintada
/ June 12, 2014Fucking hilarious. Thanks for posting.
LikeLike
rayduray
/ June 12, 2014The Guardian has an El Nino update:
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jun/11/-sp-el-nino-weather-2014
The gist of it is that ECMWF gives a 90% probability of an El Nino, but cannot predict its ultimate strength.
LikeLike
bassman
/ June 12, 2014This El Niño is taking its time, may not arrive until fall.
LikeLike
rayduray
/ June 12, 2014OTOH, this El Nino is taking the normal amount of time. What’s different is that we’re all way more attentive than in the past. In 1997-8 the first I knew of that great El Nino event was when much of Peru was flooded and the rest was a landslide. 🙂
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 12, 2014Soot and Dirt Is Melting Snow and Ice Around the World
New report highlights increased loss in Greenland ice cap from dust and soot.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/06/140610-connecting-dots-dust-soot-snow-ice-climate-change-dimick/?google_editors_picks=true
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 12, 2014Large sea ice changes North of Swalbard
During the last decades warmer Atlantic water has caused a retreat of the ice edge north of Svalbard. In contrast to other areas of the Arctic Ocean, the largest ice loss north of Svalbard occurred during winter.
A paper published in Tellus by Ingrid Husøy Onarheim and co-workers demonstrates large changes in the sea ice cover north of Svalbard. The Arctic sea ice area has been measured, using satellites, since 1979.
The new study shows that the ice cover north of Svalbard is decreasing for all months, with largest ice reduction during winter. This is in contrast to the observed changes in more central parts of the Arctic Ocean, where largest ice decline is happening during summer.
Read more at: Link
LikeLike
todaysguestis
/ June 12, 2014Hurricane Cristina Just Set A Scary Record
For the first time on record, the eastern Pacific basin has now had two Category 4 hurricanes before July.
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/06/hurricane-cristina-eastern-pacific-el-nino
LikeLike
rayduray
/ June 12, 2014That headline is pretty much overstated. Cristina is about 15 miles across as a hurricane, 80 miles in diameter as a tropical storm. And as hurricanes go, it’s a tiddler.
Compare to Typhoon Tip: http://tinyurl.com/k77phv7
At its greatest extent, Tip was 1,380 miles across with tropical storm force winds.
By rough calculation, Tip’s TS winds covered an area of ~150,000 sq. mi.
And Cristina’s TS winds cover ~5,000 sq mi.
Thus, you could hold 30 Cristinas in Tip’s wind field.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014A Cat 4 is still a Cat 4, Ray. Camille was a small storm too. But, before Katrina, it was the worst storm on record.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 12, 2014Released today
Extracted: How the Quest for Mineral Wealth is Plundering the Planet
By (author) Ugo Bardi
Description:
As we dig, drill, and excavate to unearth the planet s mineral bounty, the resources we exploit from ores, veins, seams, and wells are gradually becoming exhausted. Mineral treasures that took millions, or even billions, of years to form are now being squandered in just centuries or sometimes just decades. Will there come a time when we actually run out of minerals? Debates already soar over how we are going to obtain energy without oil, coal, and gas. But what about the other mineral losses we face? Without metals, and semiconductors, how are we going to keep our industrial system running? Without mineral fertilizers and fuels, how are we going to produce the food we need?Ugo Bardi delivers a sweeping history of the mining industry, starting with its humble beginning when our early ancestors started digging underground to find the stones they needed for their tools. He traces the links between mineral riches and empires, wars, and civilizations, and shows how mining in its various forms came to be one of the largest global industries. He also illustrates how the gigantic mining machine is now starting to show signs of difficulties. The easy mineral resources, the least expensive to extract and process, have been mostly exploited and depleted. There are plenty of minerals left to extract, but at higher costs and with increasing difficulties.The effects of depletion take different forms and one may be the economic crisis that is gripping the world system. And depletion is not the only problem. Mining has a dark side pollution that takes many forms and delivers many consequences, including climate change. The world we have been accustomed to, so far, was based on cheap mineral resources and on the ability of the ecosystem to absorb pollution without generating damage to human beings. Both conditions are rapidly disappearing. Having thoroughly plundered planet Earth, we are entering a new world. Bardi draws upon the world s leading minerals experts to offer a compelling glimpse into that new world ahead.”
http://www.clubofrome.org/?p=7169
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 12, 2014Drastic New England Lobster Decline May Be Linked to Warmer Waters
Despite booming populations of adult lobsters, marine biologists and fisheries along the northern Atlantic coast of the United States are concerned about a dramatic population decline for young larval lobsters. Scientists searching for the cause of this drop see signs that ocean currents and warmer ocean waters are possible culprits.
Dr. Rick Wahle, research professor for the School of Marine Science at the University of Maine and founder of the American Lobster Settlement Index, has been tracking lobster populations since 1989. The scope of his study today tracks the waters in New England and Atlantic Canada.
Wahle and his crew of divers are tasked with counting the larval populations of American lobster. He told AccuWeather.com that the last few years have seen some downturn, but that recently the decrease was more drastic.
“In 2013 we saw one of the most widespread downturns in the history of [this study] for sure,” Wahle said.
Link
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 12, 2014Ocean temperatures can also heavily impact lobster development. According to Wahle, the comfort zone for lobsters is below 68 F. Lately, he said, summer waters have been warm enough to create stress for lobsters. In 1999, significant lobster deaths occurred in Long Island Sound. The fishery there has yet to recover from the 80 percent loss of their lobsters, with many lobstermen no longer able to work.
LikeLike
Griffin
/ June 13, 2014Year after year in New England you hear the same thing from fishermen. “The water is just too warm this year”. It is as if the northeast has been transplanted to a different region further south. There is simply no way that the biodiversity of marine life from the past can hold for the future.
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 13, 2014Yes, adult ‘lobstahs’ are plentiful now – but in a few years they will be declining, even in the waters of southern Maine. Despite being from lobster central, I prefer Wellfleet Bay scallops! But the waters are warming up rapidly and it remains to be seen how resilient many of the aquatic species will be.
LikeLike
nelsonrsa
/ June 13, 2014It is as if the Earth were a living body with a fever, meaning cold shivers, hot spells and lots of moisture discharge within short periods of time. The heat usually kills the virus/organism.
LikeLike
nelsonrsa
/ June 13, 2014We have filled the Earth, as God commanded Noah. Maybe the first or easiest step to reduce our footsteps would be to suggest 1/0 child policies in all countries and rather than exporting food at great cost, allow needful people to find new habitat. Like John Lennon/Yoko Ono- no borders.
LikeLike
todaysguestis
/ June 13, 2014“Northern India is suffering through its longest heatwave on record, as temperatures reached a staggering 118 degrees in New Delhi yesterday. Wednesday marked the seventh day in a row with temperatures soaring above 110 degrees.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/12/india-heatwave-photos_n_5488093.html
LikeLike
todaysguestis
/ June 13, 2014Changes in precipitation pattern and risk of drought over India in the context of global warming
“Precipitation pattern has changed over many regions in recent decades. There are evidences of increased heavy precipitation and decreased light precipitation in wide spread parts of the globe due to global warming. Many studies over Indian region focus on heavy precipitation and risk of floods. But few works discuss the changes in light precipitation and risk of droughts. In this study, changes in total dry days, prolonged dry spells, light precipitation and risk of drought as indicated by Modified Palmer Index (MPI) over India during six decades (1951–2010) are examined quantitatively in the context of global warming. It is found that there are increases of 49% ± 21% and 33% ± 17% in prolonged dry spells and total dry days, respectively over India for each degree Kelvin (K) increase in global mean temperature. There is an increase of 51% ± 24% K¯1 in drought index MPI (<=−2.0). There is also a reduction of 31 ± 14% K¯1in light precipitation days over India. These changes are more severe over Northeastern and Western part of India. Increases in prolonged dry spells, total dry days and decreases in light precipitation relate well with the increases in drought index MPI (<=−2.0). These results suggest that there is an increased risk of drought due to increased prolonged dry spells, total dry days and decreased light precipitation days over India as a result of global warming."
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014JD021471/abstract?campaign=wolacceptedarticle&utm_term=0_876aab4fd7-cd8f88e8eb-303421281&utm_content=buffer3bced&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
LikeLike
1 C MAX
/ June 13, 2014Apneaman,
“Bloomberg: Americans 2-1 Will Pay More for Electricity to Combat Climate Change.”
Depending on how the questions are asked, one can get almost any results desired from these polls. A recent Gallup Poll (Gallup has been tracking this issue for years) showed in fact that interest in climate change peaked about 7-8 years ago, and has been declining ever since. Roughly half the responders expressed no concern about climate change. And, this is for no commitment, only response to a pollster’s question. What would the response be if people were asked to provide a check? I don’t know anyone willing to pay anything to combat climate change, nor willing to give up anything to combat climate change, even though some are vocal supporters of doing something. It’s all hype; nobody wants to do anything remotely necessary to reduce the CO2 concentrations to levels guaranteeing survival of our civilization.
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 13, 2014Google trends for “Climate change”
http://www.google.com.au/trends/embed.js?hl=en-US&q=climate+change&content=1&cid=TIMESERIES_GRAPH_0&export=5&w=500&h=330
A sad indictment on our society.
LikeLike
Paul from NSW
/ June 13, 2014Don’t know why that link didn’t work. I was trying an image embed (wrong thing to do),
http://www.google.com.au/trends/explore#q=climate%20change
LikeLike
Apneaman
/ June 13, 2014@1 C MAX
I was trying to be sarcastic. I posted a link earlier in the thread about the lie of 2 degrees. The thread is so long that I guess it did not take. I have also posted links to Alice Friedemann’s huge and informative site.
http://energyskeptic.com/
Not the place to go if your looking for an optimistic message on renewable energy.
LikeLike
Ed-M
/ June 14, 2014Exactly, 1 C MAX. Noone will give up anything — it will be forced upon them through austerity measures and the poor, the middle classes, the elderly and the young will all take a hit with the top 0.1% actually getting more.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014Solar energy and wind energy are inexpensive enough to result in rather minor added costs. The issue is that a major set of influential companies, the fossil fuel companies, don’t want to see their assets stranded. In my opinion, they should have thought of that before constructing what is, to me, a ludicrous business model based on pretty much wrecking everything in pursuit of short term profits.
LikeLike
dtlange
/ June 13, 2014i don’t know what will result from this but the United Nations Global Pulse has issued a Big Data Climate Challenge: http://www.unglobalpulse.org/big-data-climate-launch
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 13, 2014While we wait for Robert’s Magnum Opus, here’s another good article:
http://www.resilience.org/stories/2014-06-13/fresh-water-growth-degrowth-and-the-steady-state-economy
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 14, 2014Probably should have spaced this one out a bit…
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 14, 2014Good to hear from you! We’re all looking forward to your next posting, but take your time – I’m sure it’ll be enlightening. Are you working on the ‘grand overview’ that someone here, I forget who, suggested?
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 14, 2014A surprise is good – looking forward to whatever your next post is.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014RE the global overview.. I have enough for probably three or four posts. Still trying to figure out how best to put it together..
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 14, 2014Apparent pause in global warming blamed on ‘lousy’ data
European Space Agency scientist says annual sea level rises since 1993 indicate that warming has continued unabated
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/jun/13/pause-global-warming-data-sea-level-rises
LikeLike
climatehawk1
/ June 14, 2014My personal interpretation: Scientist touts his own data set, disses others. The sea level point seems like a good one, though.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 14, 2014The ability of ghg to trap heat in the atmosphere and ocean is 10x that of its ability to generate electricity in power stations. And yet, some people still worship the stuff as a nigh magical substance. From another perspective, we probably couldn’t have thought up a more ingenious way to wreck the future — live under the false assumption that it’s economically necessary to keep pumping out climatological poison.
LikeLike
dtlange
/ June 14, 2014Right.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 14, 2014Paraná’s central region received 380 millimeters (15 inches) of rain on June 7 and 8, while the average rainfall for the full month of June in the region is 155 millimeters, Captain Pinheiro said. The state’s weather service is predicting as much as 100 millimeters of rain this weekend in the state’s central, south and southwest regions.
Link
LikeLike
Apneaman
/ June 14, 2014War on Coal being waged by Geology and Markets, Not EPA
http://www.resilience.org/stories/2014-06-12/geology-and-markets-not-epa-waging-war-on-coal
LikeLike
dtlange
/ June 14, 2014We also have Coal’s war on the climate. A terrible war that not even the coal companies will survive. When we hear cries of a “War on coal.”, we are hearing ‘executioners’ crying as ‘victims’. It is a tragic state of affairs that we must undo.
LikeLike
Apneaman
/ June 15, 2014Radioactive Wastelands at the End of the Anthropocene
http://collapseofindustrialcivilization.com/2014/06/13/radioactive-wastelands-at-the-end-of-the-anthropocene/
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 15, 2014Dried up: Poverty in America’s drought lands
In more than two decades working at a Central California food bank, Sandy Beals has never seen anything like this spring.
Last month alone, FoodLink of Tulare County served 22,000 people who came in for food — 5,000 more than it usually serves each month and a 12 percent increase from the same month last year. For Beals, who runs the food bank, the spike in hunger traces back to one thing: drought.
“We didn’t think we would hit a big peak until August, but it’s already started to climb,” Beals says. “And it’s going to get a lot worse” as the end of the crop season normally drives more migrant workers to FoodLink’s services.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865605117/Dried-up-poverty-in-Americas-drought-lands.html
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 15, 2014Record rainfall in Sioux Falls causes flooding problems
Sioux Falls received 4.68 inches of rain in the last 24-hours, breaking the previous record of 4.59 inches set on August 1, 1957. That makes it the 3rd wettest June on record, Kyle Wiser of The National Weather Service said…………………. Luverne resident Gary Holmgren said the 6.6 inches of rain in the last 30 hours has washed out several additional roads north of the area near Hardwick, Minnesota.
Link
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 15, 2014Nearly 9 inches of rain fell in Natal from 8 a.m. Saturday to 8 a.m. Sunday alone, according to INMET, Brazil’s governmental meteorological department. But those totals are higher since the rain began Friday, first shutting down a FIFA-sanctioned fan fest at Fortress Beach in Natal, and then soaking the city’s opening match between Mexico and Cameroon, NBC Sports reports.
Link
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 15, 20142 links set me free. And please read what I posted.
LikeLike
Griffin
/ June 16, 2014That is an insane amount of water Bob. I keep wondering when will be my turn, to see locally the incredible rainfall that hits somewhere everyday it seems now. It is easy to see that our modern infrastructure is simply not made to handle what Nature is dishing out these days!
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 16, 2014Record low sea ice extent unlikely this year according to:
http://neven1.typepad.com/blog/2014/06/asi-2014-update-3-here-comes-the-sun-again.html#more
LikeLike
Andy (at work)
/ June 16, 2014Wow,
check out the melt extent on Greenland. ~30%
http://nsidc.org/greenland-today/
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 16, 2014Breaking news: June 16, 2095 – the Jakobshavn glacier has completely melted – nothing to see here, just move along…
LikeLike
Andy (in San Diego)
/ June 17, 2014It’s a conspiracy. Those sneaky scientists snuck up there last night with Bic lighters and melted it to fake the whole thing.
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 16, 2014Yes, so even though the arctic sea ice may melt may not set records this year, it looks like the Greenland melt is on a record breaking pace. Does it typically peak in late-summer, like the arctic sea ice melt?
LikeLike
Andy (in San Diego)
/ June 17, 2014Looking at nsidc, it looks like the peak runs from 3rd week of June to first week of Aug (roughly). We’re a week or 2 from peak by the looks of it.
If you look at climate reanalyzer and look at the surface wind / jet stream over Greenland, you can see where the heat is getting drawn up over the ice. As the Jet stream is wonky and is “sticky” we’ll see if it parks itself.
I was looking at the temperature anomaly for Antarctica today, anomalies over the ice up to 10C (still cold as hell ). The surface wind at the southern end (Antarctica) is pure chaos.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014High amplitude Jet Stream wave and the Greenland high. Not good times.
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 17, 2014Giant Ice Structures Found under Greenland Ice Sheet
Dr Bell and her colleagues looked at Petermann Glacier in the north of Greenland. They discovered that the glacier is sweeping a dozen large features with it toward the coast as it funnels off the ice sheet. One feature sits where satellite data has shown part of the glacier racing twice as fast as nearby ice.
The scientists suggest that the refreeze process is influencing the glacier’s advance hundreds of miles from where Petermann floats onto the sea.
http://www.sci-news.com/othersciences/geophysics/science-giant-ice-structures-greenland-ice-sheet-01993.html
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014Now that is absolutely fascinating.
LikeLike
Phil
/ June 17, 2014Monthly PDO value for May comes in at 1.9, up from 1.13 in April.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014Any word on a flip yet?
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 17, 2014Still rewriting the record books at Sioux Falls –
POR back to 1890, so this is a significant record.
TOTAL FOR MONTH: 12.97 inches
THIS IS ALSO THE WETTEST MONTH ON RECORD
BEATING 9.42 INCHES SET IN MAY OF 1898.
Link
LikeLike
james cole
/ June 17, 2014Minnesota Public Radio ran a report on flooding in various parts of Eastern Dakotas and Western Minnesota. Rivers and some lakes are breaking their banks. Here in North East Minnesota we have had a snowy long winter and much rain since it stopped snowing. Lake Superior has gained back it’s normal levels after years of low levels.
LikeLike
Ed-M
/ June 18, 2014I’m from New Orleans; we’ll be looking forward to all that water coming down the Mississippi soon.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014We hit daily records here in southern Maryland as well…
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 17, 2014Acid Seas Threaten Creatures That Supply Half the World’s Oxygen
New research findings could reveal what oceans of the future will look like. The picture is not rosy:
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/06/17-2
LikeLike
Colorado Bob
/ June 17, 2014The European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts predicts that there is a 90% chance of an El Niño hitting this year. –
See more at: http://www.rtcc.org/2014/06/16/el-nino-means-2014-could-be-hottest-year-ever/#sthash.oeWtTTgx.dpuf
LikeLike
Mark from New England
/ June 17, 2014Good find Bob, but what’s with all the denialist comments! Perhaps you can politely set them straight 😉
LikeLike
bassman
/ June 17, 2014NASA .76 hottest May on record beating .70 from 2010 and 2012.
LikeLike
Al
/ June 18, 2014Hi Bassman – re. “NASA .76 hottest May on record” – would you supply a link, please?
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014Interesting report. Pacific surface heating up today. Have the Equatorial Pacific at +.74 C above 1979 to 2000 anomaly in the latest GFS report. Although we probably need stronger atmospheric feedbacks to kick the El Nino fully into gear.
LikeLike
bassman
/ June 17, 2014.68 anomalies from here on out will make 2014 the warmest year on record for NASA GISS.
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014Looks like we’re in the .6 to .8 range so far for June just from eyeballing the GFS assessment.
LikeLike
Andy (at work)
/ June 17, 2014Greenland melt extent for yesterday reaching almost 40% coverage of the ice cap. Exceeding 2 std deviations now.
http://nsidc.org/greenland-today/
LikeLike
todaysguestis
/ June 18, 2014Scientists Close In On What’s Killing Sea Stars
“Scientists have been working for months to find out what’s causing the massive die-off and now Harvell and others have evidence that an infectious disease caused by a bacteria or virus, may be at the root of the problem. The disease, they say, could be compounded by warming waters, which put the sea stars under stress, making them more vulnerable to the pathogen. ”
http://kuow.org/post/scientists-close-cause-sea-star-wasting-syndrome?utm_campaign=socialflow&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=tweet
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014Bob will be happy to see this. At least we have a cause now.
LikeLike
Andy (in San Diego)
/ June 18, 2014Kansas wheat harvest is 260 million bushels this season, down from 319 million bushels last year. Australia is down on volume, EU is up.
The price is high, but if you check the futures look at the 2015 / 2016 commodity prices, the trend is quite apparent.
http://www.agrimoney.com/futures.php?&page=quote&sym=ZWU14&name=Wheat
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014FAO is high but dropped a little last month. Will have to see how the monsoon progresses…
LikeLike
todaysguestis
/ June 18, 2014Hottest Spring On Record Globally, Reports Japan Meteorological Agency
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/06/17/3449871/hottest-spring-on-record/
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014So NASA at 2, JMA at 1, let’s see what CPC says. If it’s 1, we can say this spring was the hottest on record.
LikeLike
Andy (in San Diego)
/ June 18, 2014Melt coverage for Greenland hit 40% yesterday. The image on the left (coverage area) is quite telling. We are still not at traditional season maximum (a week or 2 away).
http://nsidc.org/greenland-today/
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014Damn…
LikeLike
robertscribbler
/ June 18, 2014And we have 70 degree temps right now in both the Mackenzie and Lena river deltas…
Arctic looks like it’s wobbling near a tipping point.
LikeLike